10:30 : Can we discount the number of his 3x on the turn because i think that he should donking those hands (or not?) and bet pretty thin in value on the turn, with our weaker 9x, i don't remember exactly if vilain was a good reg or not, and perhaps it's hard to do such supposition.
22:30 : I like check raising because we have the J and we can barrels some backdoor straight draw on the turn and we can represent 89o on this specific card but on the other side i don't know what i'm doing preflop with 75o, 74o and 54o. I'm very not confortable too on check raise flop when our value range is narrow but this hand it's not the better candidate to c/r flop ? Not sure what we do with 89o too. Nice check raise river :) But he doesn't checks back some Q high and K high river? I find this play fantastic too with K8. I have really liked this serie and learned a lot, ty and vgg for this perf !

on super dyanamic flops, I've been going with a smaller cbet size (.4p? I'll tinker w/ size depending on stack sizes and what I think about the player) using the rationale that so many turn cards make me want to reevaluate my plan with both some of my flop vbs and bluffs. so, there's a relatively big portion of my cbet range that will be in no-man's land on a bunch of turns- which makes me want to risk less otf w my range.

on later streets when I have more info about my opponent's range and equities run further apart, I generally size up when i'm building a more polarized range to increase the value of my vbs and FE for my bluffs. however, on these dynamic flops even though i'm more polar w/ my cb strategy than I would be on super dry boards where protection betting is a bigger part of my strat, I see an argument for risking less w/ my range before seeing 1) how my opponent responds otf and 2) what the turn card is.

what are your thoughts on this? thanks.

hats off to Seth and Nick. Good content. Video could be drastically improved with less filler words like 'like'. Thanks!