$500 Zoom: Every Hand Reviewed

Posted by

You’re watching:

$500 Zoom: Every Hand Reviewed

user avatar

sauloCosta10

Elite Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

$500 Zoom: Every Hand Reviewed

user avatar

sauloCosta10

POSTED Aug 04, 2021

Saulo Ribeiro aka sauloCosta10 jumps right into part two of his $2.50/$5 zoom session review where he has prepared all upcoming hands in the solver to share the most important insights of each hand with you.

8 Comments

Loading 8 Comments...

Luke Johnson 3 years, 7 months ago

I get a lot of different solver outputs to you. e.g. 95cc at 4:25 my sim allows the OB as you played to, but 95cc only sizes down.

Just goes to show how sensitive the inputs need to be.

11:35 JTcc:
Agree with you that we should find bets here. Looks like you did not RnG. Even with bad suits, I've got to imagine our hand bets reasonably often

Overall great video sauloCosta10 , nice job B)

Doblou07 3 years, 7 months ago

Luke Johnson I have a slight different opinion on the JTcc hands multiway. I think we really don't want to do a lot of betting there with our range, and would prefer bd fd to stab at some frequency. My thought process is based on the fact that we are playing against two ranges that are much stronger than ours at this point on the nutted portion. BB has much more trips than both of us (especially since BB should be squeezing a linear range that is condensed around the broadway region, which leaves most of the 8x hands on the calling range e.g. J8s T8s 86s that are often 3bets vs a BTN RFI); and UTG is likely checking range there so he should have a strong adv. on overpairs. I just think that we should be very careful with this dynamic.

Curti o video como sempre, Saulo! Beast mode naquele KQhh contra o ceegee

Luke Johnson 3 years, 7 months ago

two ranges that are much stronger than ours at this point

Neither range is "much stronger". In fact, I believe we have the highest EV share. BTN has more EV vs UTG/BB in HU scenario's, respectively. Whilst this is not a perfect science, I do not see how the EV's will skew in the opposite manner when MW.

would prefer bd fd to stab at some frequency

Agreed that BDFD will help us. However, with the nutshot, 2 overs and no SDV, I imagine our hand will bet relatively often.

sauloCosta10 3 years, 7 months ago

For sure we cant bet recklessly in a MW pot, but we shouldnt check entire range either. As Luke Johnson said our distribution is likey to have higher EV than the 2 other players, so its only natural we should develop a stabbing range.

My inner debate about JTcc there was that in one hand we block high cards that will be folds from both players. At the same time we have a suit that blocks our opponents trips, which will only be suited combos. And I think given that we get very few folds whenever we bet anyway due to MW dynamic, blocking check raises should be of at least equal value, so in retrospect I definitely regret not rolling this one for a medium-low frequency stab

RunItTw1ce 3 years, 7 months ago

33:30 with AKo being a 4bet shove preflop at some frequency are you worried about balancing this at all with any AA/KK? The solutions I have seen on wizard seem to mostly use AKo, AQo, JJ, TT, and A4s. Also wonder how these smaller 8bb 3bet plays into the shoving range with less money in the pot.

Last hand of the video 54s talk about pure call after 3 betting. If pool tends to size up with their cbet size would you still pure call SCs as there will be less realization vs larger cbets right?

Very informative video, really enjoyed it. Still trying to get used to your graphics as my only complaint.

sauloCosta10 3 years, 7 months ago

Hey mate, Im glad you liked the video!

AKo 4bet - Shoving AA and KK over a 3bet is definitely not optimal. You would be losing EV by doing so. As you said yourself, you dont need those hands in your shoving range, you should include other hands such as TT-JJ, etc. Such range construction is unexploitable, even without having AA and KK.

54s - I would say it makes sense to tigthen up pre if you expect to face higher aggression than its optimal. The max exploit would also include always slowplaying AA pre, since people will be putting extra money into the pot for you postflop.

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy