seems fair to call KJhh in 2nd hand in order to bluff some rivers or occasionally improve and check down. Guess if IP don't want to do those calls vs x/R it won't change picture a lot. He will just bluff different combos (65 as Saulo mentioned) and overall arrive with same bluffing frequency (we will never know it tho for sure)
Cheers, seeing nl1kz would be nice as well since it barely runs and have some excellent players : Ospiel, kluka, bit ,bbb
Hey, sauloCosta10 - Great video, my friend. I must admit, when I first saw the title and realized that it was going to be you commenting on hands that other people played, I doubted you a bit and thought this wouldn't be a great format for you. My sincerest apologies, and you proved me completely wrong!
If I were given the opportunity to come up with the title for this video, I would probably title it something like "Poker Theory with Saulo: Using High Stakes Hands as a Teaching Tool." At least that's what I'd name it if the sole purpose of a title was to be purely informative, which it most certainly and rightfully isn't. But I thought that the way you described each player's range (and how they interact) at different points during the hand was vastly more theoretical, informative and didactic than a simple "hand review" video. The fact that we saw only two hands in an hour-long video is proof that this was really "Saulo's Teaching Hour," and the hands were only secondary (no offense intended to anyone, including the HS players!).
I love your live-plays, in fact, I really look forward to them, but I will never complain if you want to release more content of you talking more in-depth poker theory; even if you use High Stakes Hands as a tool!
Thanks @bigdog6391. The "e" notation in pio solver refers to the geometric betsizing. The number before it refers to over how many streets that betsizing will grow the pot geometrically.
sauloCosta10 What I meant to say was I'd like to hear about the combos that might not be intuitive to most players, Rather than hear about the hands that most people know are high frequency bets & help us understand why certain bluff combos are much better than others in the situation :)
Great video! Personally I get much more out of 2 hands of in-depth discussion compared to a couple hundred live play hands with much less discussion. Too easy for me to get lost in the action of live play while having some of the concepts go over my head because they're explained so quickly.
do u think its fine to use theese sb vs CO 3b range in lower stakes games online where some people overfold vs 3 bets and some also opening for 3x should i drop alot off hands then?
This has been one of the best videos I have seen on this site. It's one thing to know the information....and another to be able to teach it. You have both. Also this video has been very enjoyable to watch. You talk in a very detailed way on every situation. I really really hope you make another video like this one because it has probably been the most fun to watch out of all the RIO videos i've ever seen.
Loading 23 Comments...
Great Video, Loved it.
Here are some thoughts for future videos like this.
Going into more depth about the hands that are unusual/outliers from most players perception of the tree.
Giving more of an accurate description when possible of what you know/perceive about the RangeVsRange interaction on the texture.
Keep up the mixed videos they have been helpful.
Thank you RaiNHaZE
I thought thats exactly what I did in this video? haha maybe I'm misinterpreting what you said.
seems fair to call KJhh in 2nd hand in order to bluff some rivers or occasionally improve and check down. Guess if IP don't want to do those calls vs x/R it won't change picture a lot. He will just bluff different combos (65 as Saulo mentioned) and overall arrive with same bluffing frequency (we will never know it tho for sure)
Cheers, seeing nl1kz would be nice as well since it barely runs and have some excellent players : Ospiel, kluka, bit ,bbb
39min mark the 25% turn bet by limitless was extremely beneficial.
Could you attach a link to "Pio cloud" which you mentioned in this video? Can not find that on myself :|
Pio cloud
sauloCosta10 do you think 2nd hand hands like TT-QQ with a spade is better X\C on river than naked AA no spade?
Probably, yeah. But those hands should never get to that line on the river
Hey, sauloCosta10 - Great video, my friend. I must admit, when I first saw the title and realized that it was going to be you commenting on hands that other people played, I doubted you a bit and thought this wouldn't be a great format for you. My sincerest apologies, and you proved me completely wrong!
If I were given the opportunity to come up with the title for this video, I would probably title it something like "Poker Theory with Saulo: Using High Stakes Hands as a Teaching Tool." At least that's what I'd name it if the sole purpose of a title was to be purely informative, which it most certainly and rightfully isn't. But I thought that the way you described each player's range (and how they interact) at different points during the hand was vastly more theoretical, informative and didactic than a simple "hand review" video. The fact that we saw only two hands in an hour-long video is proof that this was really "Saulo's Teaching Hour," and the hands were only secondary (no offense intended to anyone, including the HS players!).
I love your live-plays, in fact, I really look forward to them, but I will never complain if you want to release more content of you talking more in-depth poker theory; even if you use High Stakes Hands as a tool!
Thanks, Saulo!
Your feedbacks are always great, than you for that OMGIsildurrrrman12 I appreciate your enthusiasm and kindness
Hi Saulo, i think it's by far the vid i liked from you the most.
I agree with all of OMG's statements.
Great work !
nice video! what is the "e" you had in the piosolver inputs? 3e and others. thanks
Thanks @bigdog6391. The "e" notation in pio solver refers to the geometric betsizing. The number before it refers to over how many streets that betsizing will grow the pot geometrically.
Great video. Please do more like these
The best video I saw here last 5 years for mid-high stakes game improving!
wow thats a great compliment, thank you FUnderwood <3
sauloCosta10 What I meant to say was I'd like to hear about the combos that might not be intuitive to most players, Rather than hear about the hands that most people know are high frequency bets & help us understand why certain bluff combos are much better than others in the situation :)
Great video! Personally I get much more out of 2 hands of in-depth discussion compared to a couple hundred live play hands with much less discussion. Too easy for me to get lost in the action of live play while having some of the concepts go over my head because they're explained so quickly.
do u think its fine to use theese sb vs CO 3b range in lower stakes games online where some people overfold vs 3 bets and some also opening for 3x should i drop alot off hands then?
Great job! Very informative.. Thank you!
Sempre agregando muito valor, Obrigado Saulo!!
This has been one of the best videos I have seen on this site. It's one thing to know the information....and another to be able to teach it. You have both. Also this video has been very enjoyable to watch. You talk in a very detailed way on every situation. I really really hope you make another video like this one because it has probably been the most fun to watch out of all the RIO videos i've ever seen.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.