$5,000 SCOOP: A Shortstacked, Tricky Final Table

Posted by

You’re watching:

$5,000 SCOOP: A Shortstacked, Tricky Final Table

user avatar

Sam Greenwood

Elite Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

$5,000 SCOOP: A Shortstacked, Tricky Final Table

user avatar

Sam Greenwood

POSTED Apr 04, 2024

Sam Greenwood reviews the footage from his deep run in the SCOOP second chance $5k with some excellent players at the final table and almost all players relatively short stacked making for tricky ICM situations throughout.

10 Comments

Loading 10 Comments...

yawnkus 11 months ago

I like this style of video very much with the in game explanations, keep them coming please

urubaz 11 months ago

Is the A/9 shove four handed too loose? 37:28

im kinda new to this but i ran it on gto wizard and i think A/9 min raises there.

Sam Greenwood 11 months ago

I'd imagine the EV difference between shove and minraiseis negligible. If GTOW likes minraise/fold in this exact lineup it's probably right.

urubaz 10 months ago

Sam Greenwood Been thinking through your reply for awhile before responding now

Before your video and response, I think I'd be shoving A/9 also and then seeing it as a mistake if the solver said differently. But you pointed out that the EV is negligible which makes me think I'm focusing on the wrong thing

So there is probably a higher level strategy concept I'm missing towards approaching a table like this. Maybe the idea to be as aggressive as possible in a big stack position even if its giving up EV slightly. Then being studied enough to know approximately which hands are shoveable from each position to take advantage of the strategy without needing to be perfect

Hope this makes sense

99overall 11 months ago

Enjoy all the content you make but would like to see if we can get more of these turbo/shorter stack analyses. Playing these stacks (sub 25 bbs) well is a must in the online and live tournaments I play.

99overall 11 months ago

Both are good, I generally care more about chipEV but others probably care about money more than I do.

trutt04 10 months ago

+1 really enjoyed this video and how you explained each players actions and what you would've done. Sub 25 itm/FT would be awesome.

Sam Greenwood 10 months ago

urubaz
I think the technical mistake with shoving A9o and why the solver doesn't want to do it. You'd rather shove suited Ax that has better equity when called. You need to have some Ax in you raise fold range otherwise your opponents can play extremely aggresively preflop when they have an ace in their hand.

I think the higher level strategy concepts to apply at FTs are
1. Most ICM outputs are for one hand only, you need to think about what the best strategy is for the entire FT not just one hand. When I get dealt A9o here, stealing the blinds is valuable, but so is preserving my chip lead is very important. Raise folding allows me to preserve my chiplead if my opponents have a good hand. However, if you always raise/fold these sorts of hands, your opponents can counter and start reshoving more to exploit you raise/folding too much. In tournament poker there is always going to be a balance between maximizing your chip EV in a single hand, maximizing your ICM ev in a single hand and maximizing your future game EV. It's hard to do and there is no simple answer.

  1. You need to predict how your opponents will play. This is a key part in any form of poker, but if an ICM output has the SB calling JJ+ AK and you think he might call ATs, you shouldn't be shoving as wide as an ICM output has you playing.

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy