You mention not being happy with the 1st hand where Coleman turns the straight with KT. I assume he was trying to induce a bluff on the turn and would have bet much bigger on the river if the backdoor flush did not hit. Seeing it cards up, it looks like he misses huge amounts of value. It seems better to bet, as Coleman has more chips and would be expected to bluff, and opponents would be hesitant to bluff. The high board also hits a lot of his opponent's range, so he may be able to call down.

Hey Sam, couple things. Just wondering why you didn't show us the first 2 bust outs even if they were trivial decisions and also it would have been really cool to hear your thoughts on the switching seats part before play begun at the final table. Maybe next time?

Great analysis Sam!

5:05 seems a good cbet spot for coleman with 2 overs and the Ad.

10:33 mirrota folds 77 pre. This seems too tight.