Pursuit of Winrate II: Button vs Cutoff in 3B Pots (Part 2)
Posted by Ryan Martin
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 9 Comments...
Hey, great video again. I would be interested in seeing the T84fd board, the oop strat seems very counter intuitive as I mentioned in the last video. I also think it's good to see the execution of at least a few board after we have seen the bigger picture. However I am also looking forward to the SRP example you mentioned. Thanks
Hey steed, sorry I wasn't able to get discussion about that flop in to this video. How about we take a look at it here in the comments? :)
CO Equity:42.4%
BTN Equity: 57.6%
As noted in the video, recall that CO folded QTo and JTo at pure weight preflop and only continued KTo via calling at a small weight. This, in addition to the BTN have JJ+ at pure weights and a 'bluffing region' that connects decently well on this texture results in a big advantage for BTN. As a result, we see BTN basically cbet range (96.5%) for the small sizing.
CO RESPONSE VERSUS SMALL, ~RANGE CBET
You'll immediately note that on this more middling, dynamic flop texture that CO i) folds less than average (avg = 35.3%), ii) calls more than average (44.3%), iii) x/r's less than average (20.5%), and iv) splits x/r range between the small and all-in options
(NOTABLE) RANGE COMPOSITION BREAKDOWN
Sets
Two Pair
Top Pair
Flush Draw
Gutters
TURN STRATEGY OVERVIEW FOR CO AFTER BTN CALLS SMALL FLOP X/R
Check - 32.21%
Bet 30% - 29.18%
All-in - 38.61%
EQUITY
STRATEGY
Hi, thanks for you in depth reply. The equity advantage is a lot bigger than I thought! Despite the CO's range wrapping around this texture a lot, all the fringe hands and lack of JJ+ really punish them. Interesting how PIO also likes to X/J some Kxss and the weaker ones at that, I'd only ever think about raising the nfd in these scenarios. Really interesting, again thanks for the video and looking forward to the next!
Nice video!! I have a few questions:
1) how the strategy differs if CO defends preflop differently such as tighter/looser or have some QQ+.
2) Also I wonder if it is possible to categorize J42r with some other flop that play similar strategy ? I assume we can use the strategy for all High-Low-Low flop?
Hey nerdshok, glad you enjoyed!
1 - This is tough for me to comment on confidently as, with many things in poker, "it depends". My suspicion would be that the stronger/narrower CO defends -> the closer equities will run postflop -> the less of an advantage the BTN will have on more textures -> the less continuation betting we'll see from BTN on average. Again, though, the exact flop texture will matter.
2 - It won't be quite so simple to simplify in this manner as both players' ranges will interact differently on different textures. Here is a screenshot from our script of the exclusively hi card + two low card textures and CO's response versus BTN cbet on these textures, which should help drive this point home.
That was a great video, thanks! I'd prefer to move on to the srp because viewers can sim the other hand as hw.
Oh nvm I just noticed you posted it in the comments.
NIce vid !(and headband) :)
Very nice video! Lot's of things to learn.
very nice one
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.