1:46 The time stamp is just one instance that I've noted. I've watched all your other videos on this series so far, congratulations on your amazing run! I've noticed that multiple times now, you've used the phrase "I'm not expecting any leads here". What kind of board texture would you expect an OOP player to be leading on? Thanks for the video!
Edit: One more question as I got later into the video, at 21:34 you made a particular note about not shoving all in after the continuation bet by villain. If you get re-shoved after your raise, would you then fold the hand? If not, it seems like an argument for shoving as opposed to small raising.
Thanks it was truly an incredible run, hopefully there will be more in the near future!
In terms of flops villains can lead the BB doesn't lead very often, but the board which we see these leads mostly happening on are low boards with a potential straight. For example 653. The small blind will get a high frequency of leading, but will heavily depend on who the preflop raiser is and also what the stack depths are preflop, so you might see SB lead vs BU at 25bb on a K76 flop for example (I made a video in the past looking at leading ranges from the SB if you are interested).
now on the turn we should actually see a lot more leading, a little less on the river. Generally this is because villain IP should be cbetting at a fairly high frequency, but when we call the flop OOP our range is strengthen considerably compared to villains range and so when a turn card comes which heavily strengthens our flop calling range you should see leading and the same to be said on the river (but not as much as villain should be a bit more polar on the turn).
21:34: No I would be raise calling this hand. On the flop we need to consider what our entire range is doing, not just our exact holding, and we should certainly have a portion of our range which is raise folding and so it would be fairly easy for villain to make some adjustments if we always raise not all in with our bluffs, but shove our value/equity driven holdings and so when putting this into Pio we should only see not all in raises at this stack depth.
Great series Ryan and as mentioned by somebody else I love the fact that you say each time if it’s a good or bad board for leading. It might sound obvious, but as an essential video I’m sure many will find this very helpful.
Keep it up with the good work.
Loading 7 Comments...
great stuff Ryan keep it up
Thanks mate!
very good!
Cheers Yojimbo, good to see you're enjoying the hand history.
1:46 The time stamp is just one instance that I've noted. I've watched all your other videos on this series so far, congratulations on your amazing run! I've noticed that multiple times now, you've used the phrase "I'm not expecting any leads here". What kind of board texture would you expect an OOP player to be leading on? Thanks for the video!
Edit: One more question as I got later into the video, at 21:34 you made a particular note about not shoving all in after the continuation bet by villain. If you get re-shoved after your raise, would you then fold the hand? If not, it seems like an argument for shoving as opposed to small raising.
Hey fullforce,
Thanks it was truly an incredible run, hopefully there will be more in the near future!
In terms of flops villains can lead the BB doesn't lead very often, but the board which we see these leads mostly happening on are low boards with a potential straight. For example 653. The small blind will get a high frequency of leading, but will heavily depend on who the preflop raiser is and also what the stack depths are preflop, so you might see SB lead vs BU at 25bb on a K76 flop for example (I made a video in the past looking at leading ranges from the SB if you are interested).
now on the turn we should actually see a lot more leading, a little less on the river. Generally this is because villain IP should be cbetting at a fairly high frequency, but when we call the flop OOP our range is strengthen considerably compared to villains range and so when a turn card comes which heavily strengthens our flop calling range you should see leading and the same to be said on the river (but not as much as villain should be a bit more polar on the turn).
21:34: No I would be raise calling this hand. On the flop we need to consider what our entire range is doing, not just our exact holding, and we should certainly have a portion of our range which is raise folding and so it would be fairly easy for villain to make some adjustments if we always raise not all in with our bluffs, but shove our value/equity driven holdings and so when putting this into Pio we should only see not all in raises at this stack depth.
Great series Ryan and as mentioned by somebody else I love the fact that you say each time if it’s a good or bad board for leading. It might sound obvious, but as an essential video I’m sure many will find this very helpful.
Keep it up with the good work.
Sorry I must have missed this message. Thank you very much for the words and glad to hear you're enjoying the series.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.