8:42 Regarding this river for beating the fourth of diamonds, do you make any adaptations vs the field? My intuition says that people fold much less in general, I don't know if you try to apply 100% theory to your game in these spots or adaptation vs field in reducing some bluffs, for example I wouldn't stop, but Ad it seems like an ok combo to give up on some occasions against certain players.
Yes, I think youre completely right that its good to be able to deviate from theory and adapt vs certain opponents/the player pool in certain spots, but it takes a significant read one someone for me to start doing that. Until then I just try to play as good theoretical poker as I can really.
The KK54 you 3bet @ 10:00 vs 50bb stack, do you think it's ok to go much wider than Vision if you believe villain is opening way wider than GTO? (As he did, J972ss). Would it be ridicolous to 3bet this hand if it were rainbow vs a fish?
Loading 3 Comments...
8:42 Regarding this river for beating the fourth of diamonds, do you make any adaptations vs the field? My intuition says that people fold much less in general, I don't know if you try to apply 100% theory to your game in these spots or adaptation vs field in reducing some bluffs, for example I wouldn't stop, but Ad it seems like an ok combo to give up on some occasions against certain players.
Yes, I think youre completely right that its good to be able to deviate from theory and adapt vs certain opponents/the player pool in certain spots, but it takes a significant read one someone for me to start doing that. Until then I just try to play as good theoretical poker as I can really.
Great to have you back!
The KK54 you 3bet @ 10:00 vs 50bb stack, do you think it's ok to go much wider than Vision if you believe villain is opening way wider than GTO? (As he did, J972ss). Would it be ridicolous to 3bet this hand if it were rainbow vs a fish?
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.