Nice video :)
I think a common mistake in this spot would be oop c-betting too much. It would have been nice to see what happens in that case. I personnaly think that I would have c-bet too much before watching the video.
Thank you
Great stuff, I like your comment on PIO adjusting villain's strategy on future streets due to us node-locking his flop strategy and being mindful about it. Also how much those strategy adjustments are really worth in EV to us. Like Nihithaw, I'd have appreciated node-locking the OOP over c-betting and also looking at a single-raised pot vs BB and which hands we 3-barell-bluff. keep up the good work!
Nice Video: At 16:18 I'm trying to understand the calculation. .03 x 2000 = 60, so 6/10 of a BB because the game is 50 100.
After that, I understood you to say that it's 60 BB / 100 or 16 bb / 100? I think you said 60BB per 100. I'm having trouble understanding how this affects win rate that much with a small % adjustment. Thanks
Hey,
It is 60bb/100, an exploit worth 3% of a 20bb pot will be worth a lot over 100 instances. The bb/100 metric can be confusing comparatively but for reference: our worst hands lose 100bb/100 from the big blind vs rfi (pure folds). Goes to show how important precision can be, especially when the pot is worth a lot of bb!
Also keep in mind that this is a model of game play that makes a lot of assumptions. With complete transparency villain gives up 3% in this example, but in practice its nearly impossible to perfectly exploit this mistake on all streets
Hey John, nice video. I'm new to PIO and trying to learn by running the same sims myself, but using my own ranges/sizings. In this one, I used my SB vs BTN 3bet range for 100bb cash games, with no ante, and the results I got were very different - OOP cbetting about 45% of the time.
Obviously I made some changes to the setup, tighter ranges, only one (small) betsize, but it still seems like a huge discrepancy. It would be great if you could take a look at the setup and see if I've done something wrong. (The only other difference is that I have it set to round strategies to 1/10 to make it easier to look at)
Thanks maybe I'll contact you in future but I'm not looking for a coach at the moment I was just trying to figure out if I was using the program right.
you are missing the IP flop bet. That means in this situation, if oop checks, ip is forced to check back. Not including donk bet option may also skew other nodes
Loading 10 Comments...
Nice healthy video :P
Nice video :)
I think a common mistake in this spot would be oop c-betting too much. It would have been nice to see what happens in that case. I personnaly think that I would have c-bet too much before watching the video.
Thank you
This is great! More specific spot breakdowns like this would be awesome.
Great stuff, I like your comment on PIO adjusting villain's strategy on future streets due to us node-locking his flop strategy and being mindful about it. Also how much those strategy adjustments are really worth in EV to us. Like Nihithaw, I'd have appreciated node-locking the OOP over c-betting and also looking at a single-raised pot vs BB and which hands we 3-barell-bluff. keep up the good work!
Nice Video: At 16:18 I'm trying to understand the calculation. .03 x 2000 = 60, so 6/10 of a BB because the game is 50 100.
After that, I understood you to say that it's 60 BB / 100 or 16 bb / 100? I think you said 60BB per 100. I'm having trouble understanding how this affects win rate that much with a small % adjustment. Thanks
Hey,
It is 60bb/100, an exploit worth 3% of a 20bb pot will be worth a lot over 100 instances. The bb/100 metric can be confusing comparatively but for reference: our worst hands lose 100bb/100 from the big blind vs rfi (pure folds). Goes to show how important precision can be, especially when the pot is worth a lot of bb!
Also keep in mind that this is a model of game play that makes a lot of assumptions. With complete transparency villain gives up 3% in this example, but in practice its nearly impossible to perfectly exploit this mistake on all streets
Hey John, nice video. I'm new to PIO and trying to learn by running the same sims myself, but using my own ranges/sizings. In this one, I used my SB vs BTN 3bet range for 100bb cash games, with no ante, and the results I got were very different - OOP cbetting about 45% of the time.
Obviously I made some changes to the setup, tighter ranges, only one (small) betsize, but it still seems like a huge discrepancy. It would be great if you could take a look at the setup and see if I've done something wrong. (The only other difference is that I have it set to round strategies to 1/10 to make it easier to look at)
hey i offer private coaching at an hourly rate. If you are interested you can send me pm and I will give you the details
Thanks maybe I'll contact you in future but I'm not looking for a coach at the moment I was just trying to figure out if I was using the program right.
you are missing the IP flop bet. That means in this situation, if oop checks, ip is forced to check back. Not including donk bet option may also skew other nodes
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.