Out Now
×

Exploits: 3 Tabling $1/$2 Zoom NLHE

Posted by

You’re watching:

Exploits: 3 Tabling $1/$2 Zoom NLHE

user avatar

Henry Lister

Essential Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

Exploits: 3 Tabling $1/$2 Zoom NLHE

user avatar

Henry Lister

POSTED Dec 24, 2018

Back to 3 table $1/$2 NL Zoom, Henry Lister aka AllTooNew discusses the benefits of not spending too much time playing with deep stacks as well as exploits to use versus regulars and recreational players.

20 Comments

Loading 20 Comments...

Scientifik 6 years, 3 months ago

Thx man great video. At 12:41 on the KcJh hand you were deciding on whether to call or not given your pot odds siting that you thought that 2.3x was a snap call 3x was a snap fold and 2.5x was close. Does this extra .5x matter THAT much in this spot given we have the implied odds and our opponents have the reverse implied odds? I would have thought my main consideration for calling this bet would be my potential implied odds I would have when I spiked the flop with a nutted hand and not this slight difference in pot odds. Say we call 2.5x and the times we flop AQT, or QT9, KJx and hose AK/AQ type hands for multiple streets make us more potentially than all the times in aggregate we check/fold. Wouldn't then the slightly bigger pot when it is 3x allow us to get more money in on those times we hose second best hands on multiple streets thus relatively negating the extra .5x we are paying in aggregate when we call 3x and are forced to check/fold?

Henry Lister 6 years, 3 months ago

KJo will flop one pair mostly when it connects and multiway this is bad in a situation where we want hands that are capable of flopping robust equity. Hands like 45ss are therefore significantly better as they are able to flop trips, straights , two pair, flushes that are less likely to be dominated than kj on Jxx or Kxx where we will often find ourselves building the pot up when we are faced against a tp with better kicker or a set.

Heads up these hands therefore become stronger but multiway you prefer to have a hand that will flop 2p+ hand strength at a higher frequency.

Scientifik 6 years, 3 months ago

At 26:27 you have Ac3c on QhJsTc board. You get check raised on flop decide to call. Turn is 9d and opponent bets half pot you fold. I like how you played that hand but I think I sometimes get hemmed up in spots like these when my opponent checks turn instead of bets. How would you have proceeded here if instead of opponent betting half pot on turn he checks instead? Do we treat this as a float and try to take it away on the turn? If so do we take the range we do this with and represent a straight and bluff river hard if called on turn?

Henry Lister 6 years, 3 months ago

If villain checks we can look to check back and delay bluffing to the river or contemplate stabbing on the turn and apply pressure vs some pairs.

RunItTw1ce 6 years, 3 months ago

Hi henry, Great video as always! Really hoping to see you making some 500NL zoom in the future.

Question #1
Time stamp 35:00 with AsKh hand on 6s7sQs4c5d board you took a bet flop, call xr, call turn, jam 2.13x pot (80.68 effective into 37.78 pot) and stated this hand as well as As9x, AsTx, & AsJx you would also make this play. This gives you 12 combos (3ea) of bluffs. Are you slow playing only AsXs or other flushes as well with this line? A2s-AKs gives you nine nut flush combos.

With the 2x overbet on the river, what value to bluff ratio should hero be using?

Question#2
I don't have time stamp, but reg opens HJ 3bb, btn 3bet 8.5bb, hero BB 4bet 25bb with JJ and you stated it's bottom of your range against Jazzman337 who is loose aggro. Are you looking to 4bet fold at 125bb effective? What about AKo and AKs?

Henry Lister 6 years, 3 months ago

Hand #1 ) I Think we can use several sizings on the river. I think a straight would be incentivised to bet a normal sizing like 60-80% on the river with a flush being incentivised to mix this sizing with shove to maximise value vs straights.

My main concern with my river shove was we have every single Asx that raises preflop to take this line so if we start shoving every unpaired Asx, that will be AK, AJ, AT, A9, A8 with A3-A2 mostly folded preflop. Therefore I have 15 natural Asx unpaired combinations that can take this line to bluff shove river and represent AXss. When opponent is having to call 80.68bbs to win 37.78+80.68+80.68. He is having to risk 80.68/199.14=0.405. Therefore villain requires 40.5% to call. This means i can bluff 60% of the time to make villain indifferent to just call every bluffcatcher. Therefore if i have 15 natural bluffs to shove the river then I must also have 10 value combinations to take this line.

I can use all Axss which is nine combinations.

So as far as balance is concerned I think jamming every Asx unpaired as a bluff is mathematically balanced with nut flushes.

Hand #2 ) At 125bb effective it's pretty close. Assuming Villain's shoving range is Primarily Ak-KK, and they flat AA and QQ sometimes jams, we should be looking to 4 bet calloff AK, QQ+ IMo and fold JJ, AQs, KQs type hands.

Looking to get some 500z reviews uploaded soon. Hope this helps. :)

histvan 6 years ago

Henry Lister if villain requires 40% equity to call, doesn't that mean you should have a 40% bluff and 60% value ratio in order for him to be indifferent to call/fold? So that means you're overbluffing if you jam every Asx unpaired.

NuevoMutro 6 years, 3 months ago

Hey Henry! Great content as always! Any spesific reason you started spliting ur ranges on the flop in 3bets pot betting 66% instead of the old #Henrys1/3rangebet?

Henry Lister 6 years, 3 months ago

Dependent on board textures and how ranges interact it sometimes is higher EV. I have spent more time looking into Piosolver and this is what I found to be the case.

Darren Butterworth 6 years, 3 months ago

At 23:30, there is an open from a tagged recreational player and you fold 33 OTB. There is another rec in the SB and BB is a reg. I see the rec only has 80bb but surely calling 33 here to setmine is > 0EV especially given we may get an overcall from another rec and will rarely be 3b?

Goodfellahh 6 years, 3 months ago

hello Henry ,
At 26:29 top left ,can you explain the reason behind your line here, you open and fold 97s against the BB 3 bets...whats your defending range in this spot? thankss a lott

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy