the [0%] is how much of our total distribution this combo represents - presumably it rounds to the nearest 0.1%. More precisely, its saying that KQ33 taken as a whole bets and checks at that frequency, with action frequencies on a more granular level (how often it bets/chks with 1bdfd, 2bdfd, 0bdfd etc) in the "all categories" section.

Right that's what I understood too. So in this particular case we can either have 1bfd or 2 bdfd because we presumably only have ds combos of this hand. with both categories (1 or 2 bdfd) it's advocating for a fairly high bet frquency ~45%.

I think this could be because our hand actually unblocks a lot of folds AAxx/AKQx hands; the board is decent for our range; we certianly can't check call; and we can turn the nuts/ set of 3's which will likely be the best hand; or we can turn a decent pair/draw to continue.

Based on what Vision told us, I felt this spot deserved a bit more attention than you gave it. Thoughts?

Thanks Richard.

I think the argument that it unblocks a lot of folds is somewhat counter balanced by it also unblocking a lot of continues, not having any card 6-J is pretty huge in that respect. Unblocking AA is pretty significant though when facing a pf 3bettor on a board where AA does quite a bit of folding, also value of alternative option is very low, our hand makes for a poor continue vs IP Cb and a poor turn probe vs IP Chk. Low pocket pairs are often seen in bluffing lines generally even when not intuitive choices.
Finally, id prob simplify that output to pure betting the 2bdfd and pure chk the 1bdfd bc we are getting peeled a bunch with no blockers to continues and we need to have stuff that can continue turns reasonably often.