$500 PLO: Back to Where it All Began
Posted by Richard Gryko
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 13 Comments...
An hour long edition is great. Thanks Richard.
Np, glad you enjoyed the extended vid :)
Hey Richard,
Re: the AJJ4 hand, if IP is missing a lot of the airball turn bluffs (which I'm assuming they are in low stakes), at what point do we start folding AJJ4 and similar close-to-indifferent hands vs the large size? If you have the sim handy it would be nice to see some response outputs vs a node-locked range that misses lots of bluffs, in either of the sizes/strategies.
Thanks!
hey,
not really a spot you can accurately nodelock for, your two options are to force a betting frequency (which monker will then construct as best it can, in divergence from a likely human oppt at low or tbh most stakes) or to construct a betting range combo by combo (which is exhaustive and creates its own issues with accuracy, blocker effects etc). Best you can really do there is reason logically starting with the equilibrium baseline - if a hand wins 1% of pot at equilibrium prob doesnt take much deviation towards tightness to turn it into a fold, if it wins 10% theres a decent amt of margin for error etc
Strong analysis, as usual. I would prefer, however, not to see a bunch of words admidst playing and Monker analysis. Switching between modalities like that can be a little disorienting.
OK, cool, it was an experimental format tweak so if thats the consensus I'm happy to revert.
I strongly disagree, and like to see the thoughts laid out
dummy question: if you start betting now combos for 67 instead of checking when IP goes for large size only, would this change again if oop was to have only pot as a size as well? So are we "interested in putting in less money on the turn?" and bet for that reason in the 67% scenario?
loved it!
i wish it was an hour it was like 15 minutes of play lol...
happy to open a conversation on whether ppl would prefer more live play, less analysis, feel free to chime in. I mean, theres nothing stopping me recording a vid or two of entirely live play, I've just steered clear from it until now because I run the risk of making a technical error and then teaching that to ppl, rather than catching it in review and either mentioning that it was a mistake, clarifying that it was an exploit of some kind, or dissecting it to figure out a better option. I do understand that live play is a very popular format though and the logical extension of that is that all live play would be more popular than a mix (although you can also argue its more of a bell curve thing where none and all are both inferior to some).
Richard is a champ!
1987:)
Another great one Richard!As much as I am greedy to see you play and play,I really love your way of disecting even the "smallest" spots,asking the questions,playing arround with the variables,simplifying the outputs to practical ones and in doing so , actually teaching how to study,which is the real gold IMO.Keep up the great work!
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.