Hi, thanks :)

13.49 - combination of that and the removal based reason given a little later. Rest of your reasoning makes sense, OOP is as you say constrained in choice of riv bluffs by just not having the best ones that often.

33.28 - in theory range check seems best, we've set our range up to be very polar on turn and capped on this river so having a small block size doesnt seem to work well, value region is capped and defined, bluff region would have a hard time generating much fold eq vs an entirely flush+ range, we also somewhat screw over our checking range if we're vbetting our best hands whilst capped. That said, it could easily be viable in practice vs the more predictable types who would call all their bad flushes vs block and underbluff them vs chk.

Hi - unless I misspoke, which I concede with my track record is far from impossible, I didnt say IP bets with a high frequency, I said he uses a large sizing - IP turn cbets are most often for a large sizing due to the disincentives in place against thin vbetting, and whilst the 7h is a favourable turn for OOP, once he checks its not like IP is screwed RvR for either equity or polarity, he still has some reasonable amt of hands to double barrel with. If I forced OOP into pure chk, IP cbet range would contract sharply into the 30s, which is significantly lower than avg, but sizing would likely remain large.

Also, tbh, not sure you can say OOP "only" leads half the time, its an extremely high frequency relative to avg turn lead %.

Hi, generally how it works in theory is that we cant bluff all our nut flush blocker combos bc if we did we'd be overweight in bluffs, so we bluff more NFB as our pf range grows tighter/more suited and we find whatever portion of our NFB combos we want to check from the combos with the most showdown value and the worst removal. I'd assume oppt here felt the KJT in his hand blocked a lot of my river autofolds, he may also have felt that in practice monotones are often poorly defended, so my flop peel freq is likely a little lower than solver would suggest, making my river distribution a little stronger. Hate to cop out, but tbh I feel like bluff/give up are both kinda ok - its worth noting that some of his better As riv bluffs might either not exist bc of preflop or go in his turn bluffing range, so mostly his NFB combos with no sd value are kinda bad in terms of removal, maybe he decided to bluff like AKJ5/AKJ8 and give this one up.