Multiway makes a gigantic difference because everyone can fold stronger hands which narrows my value range and the corresponding bluffing ranges. I'd generally choose to bet 4h3h, but this very close to threshold hand on this board texture and am only betting the hand, because there are very few stronger semibluffs outside of diamonds.
7 min slight mistake 0_0. Think you lose only 2,5$ not 5$ when you complete SB and BB isolates.
13-16 min - would you use same logic as you explained( Checking AcQd OOP on monotone connected board vs weak player after you isolated him) for example in 3b pot SBvsBTN?
Thanks for video, always hear stuff from you I can think about ,and improving playing vs recs is very important (glad you didn't play regulars much).
Thanks for the correction and the compliments :) Yes, I would. It's possible that there is raising range which hits that board texture harder than the caller, but it doesn't happen very often. As a bonus in a 3-bet pot, we can often checkraise, jam turn which is a great way to penalize him betting weak/medium strength hands on the flop.
Hello Tyler Forrester
You touched on something with the AcQ hand that clicks internally with me. I used to play strong draws very aggressively because I figured I'd get 100% equity against whatever portion of the opponent's range that folds - instead of say 60%, and vs the stronger portion of the range I'd always have around 50% minus rake. I don't know why or how I got to that thought process, but your comments about their range almost certainly being polar (and not merged) solidified it for me. Vs a merged range, that strategy would kill because most of it isn't happy and eventually finds a fold. But vs a polar, there's no point to play it as a ck/raise. Thanks!
Loading 6 Comments...
33:00 34d hey Tyler thx for the video. How do u or pio play heart heart combo on flop? Check or bet? Multiway makes a big difference?
Multiway makes a gigantic difference because everyone can fold stronger hands which narrows my value range and the corresponding bluffing ranges. I'd generally choose to bet 4h3h, but this very close to threshold hand on this board texture and am only betting the hand, because there are very few stronger semibluffs outside of diamonds.
7 min slight mistake 0_0. Think you lose only 2,5$ not 5$ when you complete SB and BB isolates.
13-16 min - would you use same logic as you explained( Checking AcQd OOP on monotone connected board vs weak player after you isolated him) for example in 3b pot SBvsBTN?
Thanks for video, always hear stuff from you I can think about ,and improving playing vs recs is very important (glad you didn't play regulars much).
Thanks for the correction and the compliments :) Yes, I would. It's possible that there is raising range which hits that board texture harder than the caller, but it doesn't happen very often. As a bonus in a 3-bet pot, we can often checkraise, jam turn which is a great way to penalize him betting weak/medium strength hands on the flop.
Hello Tyler Forrester
You touched on something with the AcQ hand that clicks internally with me. I used to play strong draws very aggressively because I figured I'd get 100% equity against whatever portion of the opponent's range that folds - instead of say 60%, and vs the stronger portion of the range I'd always have around 50% minus rake. I don't know why or how I got to that thought process, but your comments about their range almost certainly being polar (and not merged) solidified it for me. Vs a merged range, that strategy would kill because most of it isn't happy and eventually finds a fold. But vs a polar, there's no point to play it as a ck/raise. Thanks!
Awesome Corgi, that's exactly right !
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.