$500 Zoom: 23 Players, Some Good Some Bad
Posted by Gary Chappell
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 20 Comments...
Which app are you using for the line of bet % options? Good content
Starshelper
Kinda lost timing 19min, with AA in replayer, you gonna use 2 sizes on the turn? If so what bluffs you puts in small size?
21minute vs min 3b, being deep is a good thing, means we face less shoves vs our 4bet. Is that correct assumption? And on the river looks like he missed profitable(good) bluff
AQo with club would be a prime bluff. AKo with club as well.
A4 v JJ - yeah, it’s a weird line (arguably looks like a mis click) so I’m going to probably going to widen my 4B range, therefore he may widen his shoving range, and JJ becomes a fairly gross call at this stack depth. But I think I need to 4B hands as strong as this CO v BTN vs this min 3B if I’m widening my range, and just flat worse. If 150bbs+ its a bit different, but don’t want to be 4bet folding JJ as we lose so much EV vs AK and potential bluffs. He can definitely bluff river, but by river with no obvious draws, I’m fairly weighted towards Kx and AQ which isn’t folding rivers in this spot vs this preflop line and BTN v CO range I doubt. Unless it’s a massive overbet. And he doesn’t block sets/KQ or much value given I’m even continuing stuff like K3s, K5s, KQo, K6s given it was a min 3B.
Their hand makes a good double barrel I think, as has equity and can force me to fold turn with middling pairs, 5x and maybe stuff like AJs/ATs with flop backdoor flush draw. River without blocking much isn’t the best I don’t think.
I agree for big shove seems good, for small bet kinda fine too depending how his range constructed. All 67-T9 kinda shitty combo to bluff, pio bluff them time to time but overall Ace is higher EV bluff ( talking about small numbers)
Pluribus opens 33+ from HJ have u checked thoose ranges? if so what do u think?
Pluribus played in a rake free environment as far as I’m aware. 33 is a fine open and some players pure open it. My ranges have it as a mix.
nice video Gary Chappell, keep these going. Analysis on 2 table is much efficient.
Nice video. was a bit surprised you twice 4bet ATs. how often you recommend to do it? What about AJs A9s or simular hands in this spot?
They’ll all be a mix depending on your strategy, opponents 3B size and frequency, player pool exploits, rake. Less so A9s obviously.
The hand with 99 where you CR turn as a bluff and CC river; Which hands do you think are villains best bluffing combos?
...Which you assume he will get to the river with...
What minute is it?
The 98ss 3bp hand ~30 min the way you described it, you are basically saying all our potential bluffs will bet turn/ you are going to have virtually no bet check bet bluffs? I don't think this can be a thing because as you said, the Q turn will be a high frequency check, leaving us with a good amount of hands we want to value bet on the river wct. Villain can basically cf all bluff catchers no?
If this is how it came across then that’s my fault. In this spot I’d use AJ/AT as turn barrels as strong bluffs to balance value. Then some other stuff i’d use in a b-x-b line to balance my mid strength that wants to take this line. Hands that don’t make as profitable a 3 barrel given blockers etc.
what is your UO Rfi from LJ-BU if u wsnt to share from Positions
do u think LJ 16 HJ 20 CO 27 BU 44 looks good?
depends on your strategy and player pool, but something like 17/21/28/44 is what solvers suggest. SB around 45-50 if using a pure open strategy.
thanks alot man for your great information.
im thinking about 9 max for first 3 postions also. if u can say what u think if this at my std opens.
UTG=77+A5/A4s/A8+sAQo+J10s+Q10s+K10s 9.65%
UTG+1=A6/A7s KQo/K9s/109s 50% weight 11.2%
UTG+2=add KQo K9 s 109s A3s 50% 12.4%
is this looking decent or do i play way tighter from here?
i haven't played 9max in years, so shouldn't and wont provide any info. solvers are the best way forward here i would suggest.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.