Hello Peter. QQ hand 22mins. Vs flop 3b are we stacking TT-QQ expecting to get it in good enough of the time vs pair+ and some FDs? Calling 3b with KK/AA or do these combos go into check call range?
I think we can probably fold this part of our range against a flop 3-Bet, we are either dead or flipping for the most part vs. pool. By far the most common branches after we check/raise are him calling or folding and I think 3-Bet is under-done in general in the pool.
KK/AA are higher frequency check/calls on the flop here.
We poalrize much more vs. the bigger flop stab, which is itself more polairsed in most player types.
Hi Peter Clarke
First, thanks and congrats for all your work it's amazing! Chapeau l'artiste
I have 3 questions about 3 spots you played:
At 39:40 you hold 99 on 74J8. Vilain X and so did you. But you said you could stab the pot with 33 or 55. And I don't understand why you guys play like that. When you start poker, the supreme rule is "bet for value if you have 50% equity". Here it's not value. It's not protection since the folding range of vilain have 15% max against us. Generally speaking when we are turn or river I've trouble with merged range. Why would we bet if not to get value or protection? (vs a range that have 20% agains us).Plus if you do you have to add some value hand to balance your betting range and that is something I'm not happy with because when I hold 77 or 44 I rather go big...
At 31, on 53AK you hold J7 and bet small to make vilain fold. You bet small because his range is inelastic. Ok but what if vilain was a reg? It seems pretty obvious here that you're not holding A5 or 33 since you'd rather go big...I feel like exploit vilain is only betting smalll when bluffing (or thin valuing) and betting large when max (with some bluff sometimes). And I can imagine that it's not obvious. Any reg could read your soul that way
Of course not since you're a winning poker player. I miss a piece of the puzzle here
Loading 5 Comments...
Hello Peter. QQ hand 22mins. Vs flop 3b are we stacking TT-QQ expecting to get it in good enough of the time vs pair+ and some FDs? Calling 3b with KK/AA or do these combos go into check call range?
How does strategy change vs bigger flop stab?
I think we can probably fold this part of our range against a flop 3-Bet, we are either dead or flipping for the most part vs. pool. By far the most common branches after we check/raise are him calling or folding and I think 3-Bet is under-done in general in the pool.
KK/AA are higher frequency check/calls on the flop here.
We poalrize much more vs. the bigger flop stab, which is itself more polairsed in most player types.
Peter are you getting my PM's? Tried contacting you. Cheers
Yes, sorry about the delay - I've replied now. Thanks for giving me a reminder here.
Hi Peter Clarke
First, thanks and congrats for all your work it's amazing! Chapeau l'artiste
I have 3 questions about 3 spots you played:
At 39:40 you hold 99 on 74J8. Vilain X and so did you. But you said you could stab the pot with 33 or 55. And I don't understand why you guys play like that. When you start poker, the supreme rule is "bet for value if you have 50% equity". Here it's not value. It's not protection since the folding range of vilain have 15% max against us. Generally speaking when we are turn or river I've trouble with merged range. Why would we bet if not to get value or protection? (vs a range that have 20% agains us).Plus if you do you have to add some value hand to balance your betting range and that is something I'm not happy with because when I hold 77 or 44 I rather go big...
At 31, on 53AK you hold J7 and bet small to make vilain fold. You bet small because his range is inelastic. Ok but what if vilain was a reg? It seems pretty obvious here that you're not holding A5 or 33 since you'd rather go big...I feel like exploit vilain is only betting smalll when bluffing (or thin valuing) and betting large when max (with some bluff sometimes). And I can imagine that it's not obvious. Any reg could read your soul that way
Of course not since you're a winning poker player. I miss a piece of the puzzle here
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.