$.50/$1 Zoom Session Review

Posted by

You’re watching:

$.50/$1 Zoom Session Review

user avatar

Peter Clarke

Essential Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

$.50/$1 Zoom Session Review

user avatar

Peter Clarke

POSTED May 23, 2019

Peter Clarke aka carroters reviews a recent 4-tabling zoom session discussing a variety of theoretical concepts directly deployed at the tables.

5 Comments

Loading 5 Comments...

QueenOfCups 5 years, 9 months ago

Hello Peter. QQ hand 22mins. Vs flop 3b are we stacking TT-QQ expecting to get it in good enough of the time vs pair+ and some FDs? Calling 3b with KK/AA or do these combos go into check call range?

How does strategy change vs bigger flop stab?

Peter Clarke 5 years, 9 months ago

I think we can probably fold this part of our range against a flop 3-Bet, we are either dead or flipping for the most part vs. pool. By far the most common branches after we check/raise are him calling or folding and I think 3-Bet is under-done in general in the pool.

KK/AA are higher frequency check/calls on the flop here.

We poalrize much more vs. the bigger flop stab, which is itself more polairsed in most player types.

Erdis 5 years ago

Hi Peter Clarke
First, thanks and congrats for all your work it's amazing! Chapeau l'artiste

I have 3 questions about 3 spots you played:
At 39:40 you hold 99 on 74J8. Vilain X and so did you. But you said you could stab the pot with 33 or 55. And I don't understand why you guys play like that. When you start poker, the supreme rule is "bet for value if you have 50% equity". Here it's not value. It's not protection since the folding range of vilain have 15% max against us. Generally speaking when we are turn or river I've trouble with merged range. Why would we bet if not to get value or protection? (vs a range that have 20% agains us).Plus if you do you have to add some value hand to balance your betting range and that is something I'm not happy with because when I hold 77 or 44 I rather go big...

At 31, on 53AK you hold J7 and bet small to make vilain fold. You bet small because his range is inelastic. Ok but what if vilain was a reg? It seems pretty obvious here that you're not holding A5 or 33 since you'd rather go big...I feel like exploit vilain is only betting smalll when bluffing (or thin valuing) and betting large when max (with some bluff sometimes). And I can imagine that it's not obvious. Any reg could read your soul that way

Of course not since you're a winning poker player. I miss a piece of the puzzle here

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy