as far as the 1010 ,mamdatory squeeze pre i have to disagree
this is a spot in wich we will see a flop 3 way oop always,i dont see many folds pre by the reg knowing the fish behind would come along,so anything that the reg opened utg+1 its gonna be good enough to call our squeeze.
beside a 10xx board, its gonna be really hard to play correctly vs their wide ranges...i prefer a hand like KQ when we can flop a strong top pair or a nutted draw
we will flop on overpair less then 50% of the time...how would u play Jxx> boards?
i also think that the reg..if half decent will just overplay us on low boards since we never have low straights or small sets in our range pre here....we would never 3 bet pre 22>88 or 45ss or 89ss type of hands....
-high boards we have 2nd or 3rd pair
- low boards we never have a nutted range
also by flatting pre,the fish will protect us vs very light cbet from the reg,so we could lead a lot trying to get value from the fish on good boards for us keeping the reg between us and the fish honest even vs out d/l
Those are fair points, and I definitely agree that playing TT post oop when we are deep with a reg is never that nice. However, with the fish in the pot the reg will play far more honestly, and in the instances when the reg folds and we go hu with the fish, this is by far the most +ev outcome.
I dont know what this reg is like, but I suppose it is largely dependent on his tendencies - if hes pretty loose/aggressive and doesnt fold to 3bets, then yes a flat pre is likely superior, but if hes more striaght forward and folds to 3bs a decent percentage of the time, the 3betting is probably superior.
Small point on the TT hand: I think a turn raise to $152 is probably better than $154 as this reopens the betting on the rare occasion that UTG calls and the fish shoves.
Yeah I mean its insanely rare thats going to happen given the regs checked to a fish deep as the aggressor, but you are right, its definitely making it $152 makes more sense than $154. Something I didnt really consider!
Nice vid and alalisys. 25:04 what do you mean its a pokerstars flop? :). If jokeing, why do u think u've come to make this joke ... (Phil said we can ask silly questions...:) )
Loading 8 Comments...
hi nice work!!
as far as the 1010 ,mamdatory squeeze pre i have to disagree
this is a spot in wich we will see a flop 3 way oop always,i dont see many folds pre by the reg knowing the fish behind would come along,so anything that the reg opened utg+1 its gonna be good enough to call our squeeze.
beside a 10xx board, its gonna be really hard to play correctly vs their wide ranges...i prefer a hand like KQ when we can flop a strong top pair or a nutted draw
we will flop on overpair less then 50% of the time...how would u play Jxx> boards?
i also think that the reg..if half decent will just overplay us on low boards since we never have low straights or small sets in our range pre here....we would never 3 bet pre 22>88 or 45ss or 89ss type of hands....
-high boards we have 2nd or 3rd pair
- low boards we never have a nutted range
also by flatting pre,the fish will protect us vs very light cbet from the reg,so we could lead a lot trying to get value from the fish on good boards for us keeping the reg between us and the fish honest even vs out d/l
Those are fair points, and I definitely agree that playing TT post oop when we are deep with a reg is never that nice. However, with the fish in the pot the reg will play far more honestly, and in the instances when the reg folds and we go hu with the fish, this is by far the most +ev outcome.
I dont know what this reg is like, but I suppose it is largely dependent on his tendencies - if hes pretty loose/aggressive and doesnt fold to 3bets, then yes a flat pre is likely superior, but if hes more striaght forward and folds to 3bs a decent percentage of the time, the 3betting is probably superior.
Small point on the TT hand: I think a turn raise to $152 is probably better than $154 as this reopens the betting on the rare occasion that UTG calls and the fish shoves.
Yeah I mean its insanely rare thats going to happen given the regs checked to a fish deep as the aggressor, but you are right, its definitely making it $152 makes more sense than $154. Something I didnt really consider!
Nice now only FR coach here makes 6max videos too...
Nice vid and alalisys. 25:04 what do you mean its a pokerstars flop? :). If jokeing, why do u think u've come to make this joke ... (Phil said we can ask silly questions...:) )
Glad you enjoyed the video. I think you misheard me - I said 'Its a pokerstove spot' :)
Great video as always, nice to see some 6max
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.