19:00 KK66 - On the turn you said that we cant do anything else than betting full pot, does that mean we have 100% cbetting range on the turn after leading the flop? Because of we would have a checking range there, I would pick these sets + flushdraws as a good candidate to check raise. Also how does our leading range on the flop look like?
I would be cbetting 100% of my range because on this flop I would be leading mostly very strong hands 2p+ and very strong combo draws. There are very few hands that I would be bet/folding like AJTT, KJTT with one club. Therefore on this turn I will have 100% cbetting range and dont have to worry about balancing checking ranges. Of course if you have a different strategy or play against ultra aggressive floater, check might make a lot of sense.
We have just 1 player behind us, so in this spot I would just bet with the top of my range so sets, AA34, KK34, and hands like AAT3. We can definitely get called by worse and also we prevent our opponents from realizing their equity
I was just thinking about what you said at 06:23 regarding that our range doesn't really hit this board etc. The point I'm trying to make is that I think we can bet some hands that are not at the top of our range on this board if we have a betting range or do you disagree? The way you make it sound is as though you would like to construct your range here so that you are never giving up to a raise. Perhaps this is also some exploitative adjustment against the way you expect the population of opponents to play here.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating that we can bet here liberally for protection, but I feel there are some hands we could bet given how strong the rest of our range is, that might benefit a lot from being able to take down the pot and don't really help our checking range. A lot of KK would fall into that category, and they don't represent many combos, so they are not likely to skew our range.
Yeah, you might be right. Makes a lot of sense, especially with some blockers, e.g. hands like QQT7, JJT8, so that we block some raising range and still have a lot of outs when called.
Loading 10 Comments...
Hey,
19:00 KK66 - On the turn you said that we cant do anything else than betting full pot, does that mean we have 100% cbetting range on the turn after leading the flop? Because of we would have a checking range there, I would pick these sets + flushdraws as a good candidate to check raise. Also how does our leading range on the flop look like?
Thanks!
I would be cbetting 100% of my range because on this flop I would be leading mostly very strong hands 2p+ and very strong combo draws. There are very few hands that I would be bet/folding like AJTT, KJTT with one club. Therefore on this turn I will have 100% cbetting range and dont have to worry about balancing checking ranges. Of course if you have a different strategy or play against ultra aggressive floater, check might make a lot of sense.
Those leakfinder videos are very usefull! Thanks!
great video, really enjoyed watching it!
15:20 QsKs7dKh - Are you check your entire range here?
Which hand exactly do you mean? At 15:20 we have action with AQT5ds on #2 and with KK66 at #3
Sorry, I think I meant table one ~ 9 mins.
We have just 1 player behind us, so in this spot I would just bet with the top of my range so sets, AA34, KK34, and hands like AAT3. We can definitely get called by worse and also we prevent our opponents from realizing their equity
I was just thinking about what you said at 06:23 regarding that our range doesn't really hit this board etc. The point I'm trying to make is that I think we can bet some hands that are not at the top of our range on this board if we have a betting range or do you disagree? The way you make it sound is as though you would like to construct your range here so that you are never giving up to a raise. Perhaps this is also some exploitative adjustment against the way you expect the population of opponents to play here.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating that we can bet here liberally for protection, but I feel there are some hands we could bet given how strong the rest of our range is, that might benefit a lot from being able to take down the pot and don't really help our checking range. A lot of KK would fall into that category, and they don't represent many combos, so they are not likely to skew our range.
Yeah, you might be right. Makes a lot of sense, especially with some blockers, e.g. hands like QQT7, JJT8, so that we block some raising range and still have a lot of outs when called.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.