ProView : Felipe reviews AdrianaLima at 6max 0.5€/1€ NLHE (Part 1)
Posted by Felipe Boianovsky
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 8 Comments...
9:30: Let's say we want to put Td7d in our calling range. What other hands are good candidates to bluffraise here? JT with a spade? T7s without fd or bdfd?
17:55: What does it matter if villain doesn't valuebet too thinly on the river? It's not like we're bluffcatching on the river all that often and we lose vs. valuehands anyway, doesn't matter if villain bets or checks those. I would just fold on the turn btw, we're getting bluffed on the river some % of the time, villain has many flushdraws/overpairs. Basically we're just screwed on the turn/river with our hand even if villain has many bluffs. To me AQo seems to be a better hand to call twice here?
21:00: Are you sure that 87o with a spade is better to check/raise than 87o wihtout a spade? I've always thought the opposite: I've thought that 87o with a spade is better to just call here because we can continue on more turns instead of just check/folding. We allready have so many hands that we want to check/fold on the turn, I don't feel comfortable to add even more hands in my check/call range on the flop that has to check/fold the turn pretty much always. My strategy is to check/raise 87o without a flushdraw because the hand plays bad on the turn vs. aggression. Is this strategy wrong? (probably not a huge deal but I'm curious)
34:34: I like smaller sizing too on the turn but we do have a lot of hands that we want to bluff with here (MANY draws). Isn't that an argument for a bigger sizing (even overbetting)?
Almost forgot: Good video, thank you! :)
Hey!
9:30: Yeah, those are all fine candidates. What you need to do is look out for your frequencies so that you're not too imbalanced and bluffing too much or too little, and then pick that hands that you think go best in each range (x/c, x/r, lead, etc). T7dd goes better in the x/r range of all of those options, in my opinion.
17:55: You're right, but in theory, the less thinly he value bets, the less he can bluff. So the fact he didn't value bet QQ either means that we are gonna get to showdown more often (because he is gonna have to give up with more bluffs), or that we're gonna have a pretty easy call on most rivers. In practicality I do see your point though. Yes, AQ is a better hand to call as we have more equity when behind, less scare cards on the river, more implied odds on "scare" cards, etc. But that doesn't mean we can't profit with both AQ and 55. But yeah, I think turn is still pretty close, and folding is definitely fine.
21:00: that's a good point. We have to take both things into consideration. But I don't know if having a spade makes that big of a difference for check-calling either, as it's still not a great spot to continue when Qs or something like that hits the turn. But your point definitely makes sense, and I'm unsure now wether it's better to x/r or x/c with that hand.
34:34: Yes, but that alone is not enough of a reason to over bet I think. We need to be able to have the hands we're representing, we need to have range advantage, it's better if our opponents range is capped, etc. And I don't think that's the case on this board in this situation. So I still don't like this spot for over betting, and if you're worried you have too many draws, just don't barrel with all of them.
I really liked this video format! Nice vid.
Nice video Lipe.
Solid! Thumbs up!
This guy Felipe has got good videos. I am well impressed.
2:26 its more +ev to raise here. he raising the btn they will cb a wide range here. And he will barrel any equity picked up. This is a great spot to raise. We could have the best hand we block 33, K3s that he might raise pre. Also what I like is we can barrel any back door straight or flush draw and even push him off K. And they will cb a lot here with any pair 55-QQ all of those as protection bet and will fold quite often when we raise. I don't understand the call when your not gonna realize equity very often op in this spot and we have a ton of back door flush equity and we block set and some 2 pair combos. I think this is a mistake I see quite often is people hope to realize equity with small pair and they auto mode call here without thinking about the opponents range that is beating us that will fold out. I agree with calling one with no much back door equity but on this board with a lot of back door equity its perfect spot to raise and i don't even raise big I just make it 2.5 to 3x on the flop. I get tons of folds in this spot because we are not doing it often only when we have a lot of back door equity and its dry board.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.