At 9 min, what tool is it that says what pot odds we have?

Small thing, but you have to remove the board pairing flush outs vs villain's sets in the AJhh hand around 9 mins. I still think it's a call, but not all hearts are clean vs villain's sets.

You're right, I also forgot to include 68s which has us in worse shape given it removes our straight outs. That said, we should still have more than enough equity to call it off OTT versus your typical jamming range.

okay now its enought , can you stop reviewing piece of shhit stakes and go back to live videos ? are you afraid when the heater will stop you will have giving away to much information ?

first off I do like the vid instead of the comment posted above: everybody needs to start somewhere how low the stakes maybe. :

at ~3;20 . 6s in position on 9d3dqs qd board. you check back the turn ip. given the 3bet raiser from the sb already checkt flop and turn. Do we not want to bet here. ofcourse reads factor in alot making this decision.

to make a more concrete; he would have bluffed the turn with all his air righ( no showdown value whatsoever). after 3betting having the aggresion . he would protect any 9s and qs combos. Given he must know that he is perceived as strong, he will probably also bet his strong flush/straight draws.

Since he elects to check the turn: would it be likely that he has any lower pocket. 22-44-55. (given he would fire a set on the flop/turn). maybe checking his total air suited connecter on a draw heavy board. ace,x hands and j,k.

so while writting this I start to realize that on these stakes. you are probably crushed on this turn alot , so I start to like the check way more haha. i ran it through equilab and . if he`s 3betting 10% . then you are dominated for this pot.

however since this does not factor in all resteales he would try to make , and given the fact that he checks twice its closer to wether you want to check or bet OOT.

good up the vids actually like em:). if you see the oppurtunity you could try and use a hud. just to see some general things where to pay more specific attention to regarding postflop play id like.

thanks

lol @ mia khalifa pic haha

Enjoying these low stake reviews, keep doing em!

id prefer more videos you of live playing 50 nl rather then leakfinder feel like there has been a lot of leak finders lately

another great vid., well done cameron ;)

Nice vids. Always make me think.

Can I ask how you construct your calling range including CC, flat vs 3, 4 bet, over call, blind defense.

For example, I am not convinced whether JTs is +ev call vs UTG when I'm on MP. Suppose everyone is unknown. How can I judge certain hand is correct to call vs relatively certain range?

Disastrous fold with AJhh.

nice video, but the 68suit in the AhJh, is the nuts ;)

I honestly can't watch this because of the microphone echo.

whats the name of the software he uses for equity calculation while playing?

How is it possible to get in touch with you if lets say I would want to share a micro stakes session with you? Or do you just take the session of some students of yourself? - Enjoyed the video - pretty much enjoyed all your videos so far.

In the AJ hand at 4:10 you mention that we should have all sets in our range. Does that mean we should be 3 betting all of our PP's SB vs BTN? At 20:16 villain folds 44 SB vs BTN and you didn't comment maybe you just missed it though?

The 25s hand at 27:28 was eye opening to me you suggest 3b'ing 25s bvb which would never occur to me.What kind of hands should we 3b'ing in this spot?

Great video, thanks.

I think a lot of the critiques are "we don't have enough bluffs" or "we have too many bluffs" and these should have a lower weighting given the fact that this is a microstakes video where we should play as exploitatively as possible. If villains don't have a protected checking range on a paired high card flop then I see no issue with bluffing >75% for example when checked to (until they adjust)