You mention not wanting to "squeeze out the fun players during the first hand ..."

What if you are playing live, and it seems "All the players are 'fun players' " ? If the players are bad enough all around the table, do you just stop squeezing IP ?

which

Versus players whom we have diminished fold-equity against (both pre and post), we should opt to linearise our 3b + squeezing ranges. There is simply more value in having an equity advantage vs their range and being able to go for three streets with strong TP type hands. Consider foregoing the more 'speculative' squeezes as these hands do require fold-equity, and obviously considerations such as board-coverage etc aren't relevant in such games.

I watched multiple videos from you now and you always check hands like AA on Axx. Do you do that just because of your reasoning you explained in the video or is this based on database analysis where you saw evidence this is really higher ev? Reason I am asking is because all GTO software bets here always the vast majority on flops (GTORB and PioSolver for sure atleast). Sometimes it checks turns if we check our range a lot but for example in this AQx spot we bet most of the time.

I am surprised how often you don't take the aggressive approach with your range basically in spots where the GTO software does (like it also always bets the 56 that you checked for example). I realize I didn't state my question clearly but would just like to hear more thoughts about this basically.

21:41 If you had KK there, would you shove pre?? What would you expect to get called with?

Could you please elaborate on checking the turn A w/ AJo on 245dd Ax oop. You said you dont see him having flush draws because he would probly jam flop with those which I agree with. However you also said he doesnt have many Aces which I also agree with. As you mentioned he also almost never has a set. To me it seems that this card is good for your range and you are going to want to be jamming your flush draws and your straight draws. I think you can jam here with QQ+ as well.

The pot is very large and you are giving free cards in a spot where hes never bluffing(as you mentioned)... so your letting his pair draw to two outs for free, and your letting flushes draw for free as in this case, even if he doesnt have many. With a PSR of 1 I always jam an Ace here and am wondering if thats terrible.

Loved the video. I like this kind of structure for videos where you break down hands in such detail. Also not to sound greedy but would love more squeezing/3betting situation type videos at 50nl only because thats the cash games im playing :)

Hey I really like your " pre flop squeezing " video and thanks for sharing your thoughts !
I do have a question of the 56s squeezing hand. Flop comes 2dAhQd, which you said is good for your range (you could have AQo). And villain holds can be small pocket pairs and suited cards. so why giving his suited cards a free chance to draw a flush? and by checking, you seemed to show weakness to the villain. You said he is not the guy to fold often to C-bet so we check back. So in this sense, I don't understand why we are squeezing here (if we can't have a lot fold equity on flop)?

I hope I have expressed my question well here. thanks again and hope to see more of these videos.

Just because I XB flop, it doesnt automatically mean I am weak or going to lose the pot. I will often be able to win the pot on later streets vs his flop-folding range (primarily under-pairs), so we do gain some information by checking. That said, it wouldn't be a terrible cbet IMO.

Your squeeze range in SB vs UTG and BT call is TT+, AQo+, some strong suited broadways. It is really wide for me in 16nlz having less skills. So could you tell me how you play against 1) UTG 4B and 2) BT back raise?

What is SPR at 14:33 abbreviated for?

17:28: We get AJ, I was expecting us to check otherwise we’re not defending our checking range here? I can’t see too many other obvious check calls we could use here as our overpairs still require protection and want value. Unless we’re just betting our entire range here?

he had 70 behind in the aqq vs 56 hand im making him put in the last 70 ALL THE TIME- you said he was a station right?

On the last hand, why does he "never have AK here."? You said he's very tight. He opened UTG. You 3bet. He 4bet. You called. He whiffs the flop. So when you check, he checks back. Isn't that a line that actually feels like it would be quite natural for an extremely tight player to take?