I did not mean to say that I only have two streets to bet, but that I have the option of making it two streets to bet if I want to - by increasing betsize to 3/4 pot OTT. I made note of this because it doesn't penalize me for checking such a strong hand here. If we were 100x deep and I checked the flop, there is no reasonable bet size for the turn and river that would allow me to get allin on the river. Here stacks are shallow enough that it's still very reasonable to stack him, even if I check the flop. I agree that betting 1400 on the flop makes the pot size work out very nicely throughout the hand, allowing for a nice betsize OTR to bet allin. If I were playing of the three villains on my right in this hand, I would have chosen that line, most of the time. 

Also, good playing on the tables recently. I like your style. Cheers and GL. 

Sweet! I'm glad you're enjoying these videos. Yeah no problem on the HUD. My stats are: 

VPIP/RFI/FoldToSteal/TOTAL hands

FoldTo3b/3b/FoldTocbet/Cbet/BetVsMissedCbet. 

Unfortunately I'm no HUD expert, and imagine collecting and utilizing data from it is currently one of my principle leaks. I tend to use it to keep on eye on those general "front page" stats, and if upon a quick glance, I notice something out of line in one of those statistics, I'll make an adjustment to exploit it. As my table count gets lower toward the end of a session, I'll look into some more detailed statistics about my opponents and try to come to some sort of understanding of their overall approach to the game. To be quite honest though, this level of HUD data analysis is more of an ideal than it is a habit, and as I said, a leak I personally need to plug. Does that adequatly answer you question? I'm happy to go into it more or field follow-up quesitons. 

Hey there Annouza. No, I think that when the effective stack (my stack is only 20bb) is around 20 big blinds, that most regs (and all players) are going to be min raising here. This is what I would do as well, although I might make it a bit more, 2.25x or something. The key point is that at this shallow of a stack depth, 2.5x or more is too big. You don't need to risk that much on your steal. I will also note that I don't think it's that big of a difference at all what size you use. And I feel good about being in this camp, because I've seen Sauce say the same thing in his videos about preflop raise size at 100 BB NL! If it doesn't matter too much at deeper stacks vs better players, it certainly isn't going to at shallower stacks with worse players (in general, not villain in this hand). 

I like where your head's at here though, in terms of trying to figure out what an opponents raise size is likely to mean. And by that same idea, what our opponents are likely to think of the raise sizes we choose.