Out Now
×

$5,000 High Roller: From $50k -> $63k -> $36k to $50k

Posted by

You’re watching:

$5,000 High Roller: From $50k -> $63k -> $36k to $50k

user avatar

Apoth

Elite Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

$5,000 High Roller: From $50k -> $63k -> $36k to $50k

user avatar

Apoth

POSTED Mar 01, 2018

Apoth begins a new series reviewing his play from this $5k Highroller MTT played on PokerStars.

14 Comments

Loading 14 Comments...

kneehall 7 years, 1 month ago

Awesome video as always. Looking forward to more PokerGo footage. Any luck with blacking out whole cards except for Hero in live play footage?

Cheers!

Apoth 7 years, 1 month ago

This series is quite a few parts, but I'll look into that afterwards. I try to keep my videos on a rotation so that one type isn't overused.

Justis 7 years, 1 month ago

Thanks for the videos! If you ever run out of ideas, I have a suggestion. You could pick out a video from this YouTube channel and put your commentary on it: https://www.youtube.com/user/BanZzai33/videos

There's a lot of SCOOP, WCOOP, Winter Series FTs on there. Plus, it has payouts, all the hole cards, and even the chat.

bkice11 7 years ago

86s (~6:45-8:45): in this hand, and hands like it, i would like to hear your general thoughts/plans on how to approach the turn and river on various runouts. how to proceed oop on various turns when we get flatted seems like it will be often be a tough spot and worthy of discussion... especially when you make a comment one minute prior about how you have an edge on the field at deepstacked poker because of your cash background, i'd like to hear your thoughts on the tougher streets to play deepstacked more often, even if the discussion is theoretical.

Apoth 7 years ago

It's kind of tough for me to talk about how to play all possible turn/river combinations in a comment section. I think your question is worth investigating however and worth looking up in pio.

I may turn this into a standalone video since the game tree is so big at this stack depth i suspect most people can't run it on their computer.

S.M.S. 7 years ago

Thanks for video Chris.

17:30 AQ on K52hh
Seems a weird 1/4pot cbet 3way w/ no backdoors.
I assigned BTN 8% capped flatcall range and our CO range doesn`t have neither equity nor nut advantage ( sets - 2% against 3% and TPs - 14% / 18%) (equities - 35%/37%/27% co/btn/bb).
Looks awkward spot to apply "cbet range" strat (which you essentially imply cbetting this hand) given how often one of them will proceed and you say some really weird things starting at 17:40 "I think 5 and 2 are impossible to hit.... our hand is most likely to be good... just betting and protecting our equity is best...."

I would check it quite often even if I opt to cbet close to range. AQ has 32% 3way and youll get raised ~35-40% by one of them and they both fold around ~20% which is less than what you need and your turn plan is give-up unless you improve right so I really dont understand you decision. Maybe you could elaborate.

Justis 7 years ago

I could be wrong, but I believe by "impossible to hit" Chris meant that there shouldn't be a lot of hands containing a 5 or a deuce in the opponents' preflop flat-calling ranges. The BB will definitely have some, but the BTN should have very few of them if any.

Apoth 7 years ago

As posted below when I said that the 2 and 5 were impossible to hit I didn't mean literally impossible I just meant they were two of the least represented cards in both ranges (BTN has A2s and 22 and thats it? BTN has 56s,A5s,55 and maybe 45s or 75s?) That's pretty tough to hit for BTN and sure, BB has a bunch of 2x and 5x but he's got a bunch of other stuff too.

Kxx is still a good board for CO here relatively speaking and I thought the 5/2 made me want to lean towards auto cbet. In hindsight I like playing a lot more checking in this spot and would check this hand as well.

S.M.S. 7 years ago

At 31:00 you certainly turned flush in a bluff esp considering SPR otr.
No matter how we construct his river overbet range he doesn`t call enough worse to make it +ev despite your correct comment you have very good equity vs his whole overbet range.

NFs can be value crai, vs some ranges its viable to value crai worse than NF w/ quite low freq but even this case PIO suggests doing it w/ smth like K5s (where villain overbet a lot of flushes and should/could call worse occasionally)

Apoth 7 years ago

Yea, agreed. I didn't like that hand. It was a sort of weird one (You don't generally face this line+ bet size combination). You also tend not to have weak flush+ 5 etc. I definitely messed it up but I think it's a rare enough spot I'm not too concerned. In hindsight I like call on river.

Cassoulet 7 years ago

Hello Great vid.
about the 86s (~6:45-8:45) I saw in the next parts that you are thinking of making a pio vid about this spot so I d like to ask few questions.
That deep 250bb deep : OTF after our check/raise Villain can't have a 3bet range right ? We have all the sets he does not . So on the long run by checkraising more frequelntly these spots very deep aren't we also realizing more equity than with the checkcall line?

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy