triple draw? single draw limit? single draw no limit? :) Guess you mean 2-7 triple draw :) I am thinking about making another final table review, might be 2-7td, waiting for some other requests
Great video as always. I think with the 50k reviewing 6 handed is more interesting and more closely resembles cash play. After that I would say 3 handed for the wider rngs.
For additional games from the series, I think the stud variants (stud hi and hi lo) and 2-7td and nl single draw would be interesting.
deuce triple draw limit yes.
or the mixed triple draw limit games deuce, ace to five and badugi. you can review the final table of the 2500 wsop event just right now.
such a good game
At minute 24 in 27TD, you mention that you do not like Eveslage's raise with 876 after 2 draws. I also think Coleman's 3! with #3 is bad. Eveslage's could break a hand he would pat with and possible draw out. Eveslage could have occasionally have a #1 or #2, in which case the 3! costs Coleman 2 bets. Eveslage could also fold or fold on the river. It seems to make Coleman's hand to face up and get marginal value at too high a potential cost.
Loading 6 Comments...
2-7 please;)
triple draw? single draw limit? single draw no limit? :) Guess you mean 2-7 triple draw :) I am thinking about making another final table review, might be 2-7td, waiting for some other requests
Great video as always. I think with the 50k reviewing 6 handed is more interesting and more closely resembles cash play. After that I would say 3 handed for the wider rngs.
For additional games from the series, I think the stud variants (stud hi and hi lo) and 2-7td and nl single draw would be interesting.
Thanks.
Triple yeah
deuce triple draw limit yes.
or the mixed triple draw limit games deuce, ace to five and badugi. you can review the final table of the 2500 wsop event just right now.
such a good game
At minute 24 in 27TD, you mention that you do not like Eveslage's raise with 876 after 2 draws. I also think Coleman's 3! with #3 is bad. Eveslage's could break a hand he would pat with and possible draw out. Eveslage could have occasionally have a #1 or #2, in which case the 3! costs Coleman 2 bets. Eveslage could also fold or fold on the river. It seems to make Coleman's hand to face up and get marginal value at too high a potential cost.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.