In Scenario 2 where MP bets Jhh+ on turn, what is the plan for blank rivers?

KJ+ seems wide for BTN with a player still to act. How does BTN's turn range change if he's only calling K:(j9+,hh,JJ,QQ,Ah) T:(AJ+,hh,JJ,QQ,Ah) for one pair. G was massive and I'm wondering how much these adjustments take away. Also, don't expect BTN to call a hand like QJ87ccdd.

Thank you for the interesting and thought-provoking video, I agree that in practice this situation is played very differently, with the second analysis mirroring tougher games and the original plan in softer more passive games

Tom, Interesting video topic thanks for making this one.

One piece of constructive criticism is your videos tend to go very long, and a lot of the time was spent reading off slides about your layout of each players strategies. It would be nicer if these were presented in an easier to read form like a table or tree if you are going to read them so you can go over it faster. The alternative is to just have people pause the video to read the strategies so you can move on to the analysis.

Either way thanks for the content.

jeff - yeah my brain is very text and number centric, and not visual. So that is something I have to work on in presentations. The good news is that this series at least and other stuff coming up will make heavy use of poker juice, which obviously has a nice user interface.

In general, I'll simply work on mixing it up - text, tables, other visual aids., etc.

Anyway, I'm aware of this, just tend to default to what's comfortable when the deadline hits!

atown - I think you make good points. It will be interesting to revisit the ranges assumptions (all the way back to flop) after seeing the EV's in videos 2 and 3. I think in general more middle and bottom pair + extra stuff belongs over TPMK... but on this board that is tougher than say T74hh. where you have KQJ7 bdfd and such as better peels than bare JT/T9 (hard to have bare JT/T9 but you get the point)