Thanks for the video !
Very interesting, I like how you tediously changed the variable one by one. I had a very clear idea of how to play the spot after the 45min. Gonna do the pio analysis like this now.
I was unsure of how this video would be received given how often I was unsure or incorrect (though that kinda was the point of the video, since I'm trying to learn while recording). Because they take so long to make, I wasn't planning on doing more of this type if members didn't really like them. However, I'll definitely be open to doing more of this type of thing in the future.
I also liked the video, thanks Paul. I would like to see a similar video going through some 3-bet pot spots to see how OOP's EV changes by choosing different c-bet strategies and by changing our assumptions about IP's defending range. I've been doing some work about this with CREV but I have nothing to compare to.
I love these formats for learning. I think this program is so amazing and i cant wait to own a copy for myself. Just wanted to say I think you're excellent at making these videos, out of all the coaches who make pio videos which i have seen you rank 2nd only to Daniel IMO.
I am by far no expert on Pio but i suspect that the increase in EV you talk about in min 13 is due to restrictions you impose on betsize and line-options further along the game tree.
On a related note: I can understand why you use only one betsize for further streets (technical limitiations on your PC?) but i am a little suspicious as to the validity of your results given those restrictions.
I assume this is a bigger problem the deeper the SPR is since i found PIOsolver does very little "slowplay" given those medium betsizes from villain. Actually i kind of suspect it is more viable to establish a singular betsizing for the flop and open up the possibilities on later streets. You talk about that as well but you do not implement it.
Should you ever consider doing another similar video i suggest you give a small overview how often different handstrengths are actually present for each player on the particular boardtexture. Esspecially since you use weights for each combo.
Brilliant video thanks. Would you be kind enough to give OOP one betsize of 50 or 75 (both or you choose haha) on the flop and let us know the ev difference compared to the 2 sizings and the one small size?
Loading 13 Comments...
Thanks for the video !
Very interesting, I like how you tediously changed the variable one by one. I had a very clear idea of how to play the spot after the 45min. Gonna do the pio analysis like this now.
Thanks for the kind words, Aaron and Ben.
I was unsure of how this video would be received given how often I was unsure or incorrect (though that kinda was the point of the video, since I'm trying to learn while recording). Because they take so long to make, I wasn't planning on doing more of this type if members didn't really like them. However, I'll definitely be open to doing more of this type of thing in the future.
Nice video Paul, would also like to see more of these!
I also liked the video, thanks Paul. I would like to see a similar video going through some 3-bet pot spots to see how OOP's EV changes by choosing different c-bet strategies and by changing our assumptions about IP's defending range. I've been doing some work about this with CREV but I have nothing to compare to.
Essentials need more vids like this.
Good video, and much appreciated Paul!
I love these formats for learning. I think this program is so amazing and i cant wait to own a copy for myself. Just wanted to say I think you're excellent at making these videos, out of all the coaches who make pio videos which i have seen you rank 2nd only to Daniel IMO.
I am by far no expert on Pio but i suspect that the increase in EV you talk about in min 13 is due to restrictions you impose on betsize and line-options further along the game tree.
On a related note: I can understand why you use only one betsize for further streets (technical limitiations on your PC?) but i am a little suspicious as to the validity of your results given those restrictions.
I assume this is a bigger problem the deeper the SPR is since i found PIOsolver does very little "slowplay" given those medium betsizes from villain. Actually i kind of suspect it is more viable to establish a singular betsizing for the flop and open up the possibilities on later streets. You talk about that as well but you do not implement it.
Should you ever consider doing another similar video i suggest you give a small overview how often different handstrengths are actually present for each player on the particular boardtexture. Esspecially since you use weights for each combo.
Otherwise nice vid
great video. more please!
Brilliant video thanks. Would you be kind enough to give OOP one betsize of 50 or 75 (both or you choose haha) on the flop and let us know the ev difference compared to the 2 sizings and the one small size?
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.