Out Now
×

Mastering Flop Play: 25BB's BTN vs BB - Ace High Boards

Posted by

You’re watching:

Mastering Flop Play: 25BB's BTN vs BB - Ace High Boards

user avatar

Pedro Madeira

Essential Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

Mastering Flop Play: 25BB's BTN vs BB - Ace High Boards

user avatar

Pedro Madeira

POSTED Mar 25, 2019

Pedro Madeira aka gusmaa dives into the first practical study session of his solver series Mastering Flop Play discussing how to navigate A high flop structures BTN vs BB with 25BB effective stacks.

23 Comments

Loading 23 Comments...

Eike Onodera 6 years ago

conteúdo denso porém muito importante estudar esses spots mais comuns (vs BB), principalmente no BTN onde fazemos mais dinheiro. parabéns gusmaa. aguardando o próximo !!

Pedro Madeira 6 years ago

Realmente é um conteúdo pesado e como não pretendo fazer uma série de 1 milhão de vídeos tive que agrupar vários flops, sendo que o ideal seria fazer análises individuais. Mas espero que mesmo assim seja o suficiente para ajudar a galera a entender um pouco da lógica por trás de variados equilíbrios.

Risva10 6 years ago

Hey Pedro, great video. At 25:30 you are talking about how we need to have a high enough x/raise frequency vs the small c-bet. Do you x/shove always are have some range to raise smaller and fold/call ?

Risva10 6 years ago

Ohh right you have to input the raise amount at the start. Do you think overall the raise strategy used in the video is better than just shoving? Is this strategy higher EV for most sims this deep? Do you think the difference in EV between the two is negligible?

Pedro Madeira 6 years ago

Yes, solver doesn't jam much with that high SPR, it would have a higher x/shove freq. with lower ones such as 2.5 <

Alex 5 years, 4 months ago

Around 12:30 you're explaining that KJ bets the larger sizing on AKJ with a higher frequency than AJ because of removal effects. But AK bets the larger sizing at an even higher frequency than KJ. Any ideas why this might be?

Cassoulet 5 years, 4 months ago

Hello
07:45 I get that JJ is in the big bet for IP because its unblock the top of the calling range. But why QT is in the small bet ? Only because it blocks AT? That surprises me a little because QT also blocks a lot of OOP offsuit folding range so I guess OOP ends up calling more when IP bet QT.

Pedro Madeira 5 years, 4 months ago

You need to balance your strategy having strong hands betting for the small and big sizing, and as this is a low SPR, and we can get all chips in the middle with only two streets, you don't necessarily need to bet big with all strong hands.
Besides, most of OOP calling range vs the big bet contains a Q in it, so you do not want to block that.

MrMik 4 years, 8 months ago

Hi Pedro Madeira . I am starting to watch now this series and by coincidence I am also doing similar study for myself, so interested to cross check-results. My question is the following: would you expect relevant differences in terms of results using 0.2% accuracy insted of the 0.5% you have been using in these sims? Thank you for the good work and gl at the tables

Pedro Madeira 4 years, 8 months ago

Hi!

No, for short stacks I do not think there will be a big difference. Def, when you work with bigger stacks and higher number of sizings.

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy