conteúdo denso porém muito importante estudar esses spots mais comuns (vs BB), principalmente no BTN onde fazemos mais dinheiro. parabéns gusmaa. aguardando o próximo !!
Realmente é um conteúdo pesado e como não pretendo fazer uma série de 1 milhão de vídeos tive que agrupar vários flops, sendo que o ideal seria fazer análises individuais. Mas espero que mesmo assim seja o suficiente para ajudar a galera a entender um pouco da lógica por trás de variados equilíbrios.
Hey Pedro, great video. At 25:30 you are talking about how we need to have a high enough x/raise frequency vs the small c-bet. Do you x/shove always are have some range to raise smaller and fold/call ?
Ohh right you have to input the raise amount at the start. Do you think overall the raise strategy used in the video is better than just shoving? Is this strategy higher EV for most sims this deep? Do you think the difference in EV between the two is negligible?
Around 12:30 you're explaining that KJ bets the larger sizing on AKJ with a higher frequency than AJ because of removal effects. But AK bets the larger sizing at an even higher frequency than KJ. Any ideas why this might be?
Hello
07:45 I get that JJ is in the big bet for IP because its unblock the top of the calling range. But why QT is in the small bet ? Only because it blocks AT? That surprises me a little because QT also blocks a lot of OOP offsuit folding range so I guess OOP ends up calling more when IP bet QT.
You need to balance your strategy having strong hands betting for the small and big sizing, and as this is a low SPR, and we can get all chips in the middle with only two streets, you don't necessarily need to bet big with all strong hands.
Besides, most of OOP calling range vs the big bet contains a Q in it, so you do not want to block that.
Hi Pedro Madeira . I am starting to watch now this series and by coincidence I am also doing similar study for myself, so interested to cross check-results. My question is the following: would you expect relevant differences in terms of results using 0.2% accuracy insted of the 0.5% you have been using in these sims? Thank you for the good work and gl at the tables
Loading 23 Comments...
conteúdo denso porém muito importante estudar esses spots mais comuns (vs BB), principalmente no BTN onde fazemos mais dinheiro. parabéns gusmaa. aguardando o próximo !!
Realmente é um conteúdo pesado e como não pretendo fazer uma série de 1 milhão de vídeos tive que agrupar vários flops, sendo que o ideal seria fazer análises individuais. Mas espero que mesmo assim seja o suficiente para ajudar a galera a entender um pouco da lógica por trás de variados equilíbrios.
Thx for the vid
you are welcome
Hey Pedro, great video. At 25:30 you are talking about how we need to have a high enough x/raise frequency vs the small c-bet. Do you x/shove always are have some range to raise smaller and fold/call ?
In the sim there's no x/shove, only x/raise for 50% pot
Ohh right you have to input the raise amount at the start. Do you think overall the raise strategy used in the video is better than just shoving? Is this strategy higher EV for most sims this deep? Do you think the difference in EV between the two is negligible?
Yes, solver doesn't jam much with that high SPR, it would have a higher x/shove freq. with lower ones such as 2.5 <
Superb content! Ty!
thanx!
Conteúdo muito bom Pedro Madeira ansioso para ver os proximos !
Bom que gostou!
Nice one man, thanks!
You are welcome!
Mano... que trampo eim fiii.... Show nice video. Thanks
hehe, realmente dá bastante trabalho, mas faz parte. Bom que curtiu.
Around 12:30 you're explaining that KJ bets the larger sizing on AKJ with a higher frequency than AJ because of removal effects. But AK bets the larger sizing at an even higher frequency than KJ. Any ideas why this might be?
I would assume its because AK has higher value as it dominates a wider part of OOPs range including AJ
Hello
07:45 I get that JJ is in the big bet for IP because its unblock the top of the calling range. But why QT is in the small bet ? Only because it blocks AT? That surprises me a little because QT also blocks a lot of OOP offsuit folding range so I guess OOP ends up calling more when IP bet QT.
You need to balance your strategy having strong hands betting for the small and big sizing, and as this is a low SPR, and we can get all chips in the middle with only two streets, you don't necessarily need to bet big with all strong hands.
Besides, most of OOP calling range vs the big bet contains a Q in it, so you do not want to block that.
Hi Pedro Madeira . I am starting to watch now this series and by coincidence I am also doing similar study for myself, so interested to cross check-results. My question is the following: would you expect relevant differences in terms of results using 0.2% accuracy insted of the 0.5% you have been using in these sims? Thank you for the good work and gl at the tables
Hi!
No, for short stacks I do not think there will be a big difference. Def, when you work with bigger stacks and higher number of sizings.
Thanks for the video Pedro !
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.