min 1:30 89o on T64 rainbow board, aren´t you worry of beeing xRaising too many bluffs in a board where you just rep around ~10 value combos (T4s, T6s, 44, 66) ? 89 is at least the best of your semibluffs, is never xC an option with this kind of hand ? Or maybe you would play the same with AT/KT/QT so you can bluff higher ?? But probably you are calling with them with a higher frecquency than raising. If you are xRaising every str8draw (i don´t know if you have every 89/87/75 in your calling-pre-range) this let you with a value/bluff ratio of 10/48, a little too high. Could be this a leak ? An opportunity for villain exploit us?
min27 AcAh on 3h9hJc 6c . Since you are blocking with your aces both flushdraws... Could this be a fact to increase the value of x/shove the turn ? It suppose a higher percentage of Jx hands in his range. Of course standard would be bet to protect all our weak draws, but since this is the only combo that is blocking both AXs flush draws...
Phil mentions he would cr JT QT KT and the AT he didn't 3bet. That's a lot of combos to help balance. Also I suspect to Kanu's pf sizing Phil defends all of those hands you mentioned (57,89,97,78) however this doesn't make Phil unbalanced with his cr range because
A) with 57 he is more apt to xc given his equity is high enough to justify it.
B) with 89 he occasionally will win at SD unimproved vs other str8 draws thus 89 makes a better candidate to cr than other str8 draws.
C) some of the suited varieties of the aforementioned hands will be in Phil's pf 3b range reducing his combos he has on this flop when flatting.
The hand when you have AJo 39 minutes in I think you have a capped range and that's why Kanu overbets the river. In the Toy Gaming video Ben talks about the spot where it goes check check on the flop, check call on the turn, and check bet on the river OOP has a capped range.
Loading 7 Comments...
min 1:30 89o on T64 rainbow board, aren´t you worry of beeing xRaising too many bluffs in a board where you just rep around ~10 value combos (T4s, T6s, 44, 66) ? 89 is at least the best of your semibluffs, is never xC an option with this kind of hand ? Or maybe you would play the same with AT/KT/QT so you can bluff higher ?? But probably you are calling with them with a higher frecquency than raising. If you are xRaising every str8draw (i don´t know if you have every 89/87/75 in your calling-pre-range) this let you with a value/bluff ratio of 10/48, a little too high. Could be this a leak ? An opportunity for villain exploit us?
min27 AcAh on 3h9hJc 6c . Since you are blocking with your aces both flushdraws... Could this be a fact to increase the value of x/shove the turn ? It suppose a higher percentage of Jx hands in his range. Of course standard would be bet to protect all our weak draws, but since this is the only combo that is blocking both AXs flush draws...
Very nice video ;)
Phil mentions he would cr JT QT KT and the AT he didn't 3bet. That's a lot of combos to help balance. Also I suspect to Kanu's pf sizing Phil defends all of those hands you mentioned (57,89,97,78) however this doesn't make Phil unbalanced with his cr range because
A) with 57 he is more apt to xc given his equity is high enough to justify it.
B) with 89 he occasionally will win at SD unimproved vs other str8 draws thus 89 makes a better candidate to cr than other str8 draws.
C) some of the suited varieties of the aforementioned hands will be in Phil's pf 3b range reducing his combos he has on this flop when flatting.
Haha ''cant fault past Phil too much''
Liked it, more footage please, Phil.
Love this series!
The hand when you have AJo 39 minutes in I think you have a capped range and that's why Kanu overbets the river. In the Toy Gaming video Ben talks about the spot where it goes check check on the flop, check call on the turn, and check bet on the river OOP has a capped range.
Do you think your range is capped here?
Loving the videos! -Mush
Moarrrr!
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.