Very interesting final hand. The type of hand I could see myself "gross, he's never bluffing..." and still flick it in (obviously that's a pretty bad leak but I definitely do it sometimes).
Hey Phil, I have watched almost all of your videos since the old bluefirepoker days, but I can't remember when your comments made me laugh that much like in the last hand: "I think this is a super clear cut fold"... "I don't like that call at all"... "I think really terrible call". :-)))
In the last hand, if potting only exposes us to AA check-raise, wouldn't it make some sense to bet half pot and try to get called by some flushes or other bluff catchers?
(Not Phil, take with grain of salt) There's a weird pull in this hand -- yes, I think we mostly just get x/r by AA and everything from OOP folds. However, I think IP will definitely have some calling hands including A9, Q9, QQ. So, I think if you think of them as some super-person defending range, it still makes sense to bet because we'll often get a call from IP and a fold from OOP.
At minute 27ish when we defend with TT86sss , you mentioned that you like both x/c or x/r vs cbet due to our hand being so high equity, but I was thinking having the TT could be very useful for future bluffs when a J or Q hits which would incline me to x/c vs bet but not sure if this thinking it’s flawed due to the super high equity we have with this hand anyways
Loading 13 Comments...
Very interesting final hand. The type of hand I could see myself "gross, he's never bluffing..." and still flick it in (obviously that's a pretty bad leak but I definitely do it sometimes).
We all do :)
Phil you're a boss, congratz on the comeback win in the challenge vs venividi that was amazing !
Thank you!!
Hey Phil, I have watched almost all of your videos since the old bluefirepoker days, but I can't remember when your comments made me laugh that much like in the last hand: "I think this is a super clear cut fold"... "I don't like that call at all"... "I think really terrible call". :-)))
Wish you only the best!
In the last hand, if potting only exposes us to AA check-raise, wouldn't it make some sense to bet half pot and try to get called by some flushes or other bluff catchers?
(Not Phil, take with grain of salt) There's a weird pull in this hand -- yes, I think we mostly just get x/r by AA and everything from OOP folds. However, I think IP will definitely have some calling hands including A9, Q9, QQ. So, I think if you think of them as some super-person defending range, it still makes sense to bet because we'll often get a call from IP and a fold from OOP.
At minute 27ish when we defend with TT86sss , you mentioned that you like both x/c or x/r vs cbet due to our hand being so high equity, but I was thinking having the TT could be very useful for future bluffs when a J or Q hits which would incline me to x/c vs bet but not sure if this thinking it’s flawed due to the super high equity we have with this hand anyways
Incredibly disrespectful line by Shea W. Think they should have their account suspended for "game integrity issues".
Excellent analysis on that last hand, really opened my eyes.
Best PLO teacher in the world!
Hey Phil why are you so nice?
Great Video, thank you.
Phil Galfond I love when you go through your thought process in Vision. Not wasting my time to look at " what I usually do on my own." in Vision.
In fact I would love to see more of this.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.