I am very happy that I watched that nice video of yours. I am using Vision also and do study 3 bP SB vs BU atm. Starting from my next study session I will look more closely at which hand classes the solver uses for the different lines and try to find answers of why is that so.
With that and other videos of rio e.g imbajimba I am more convinced of how important it is to know the boards where we have high betting going. And to know which hand classes to use for the different sizing and why.
Thanks

Thanks for the video! The Vision software looks really user friendly. Maybe I need to switch over the the Great Game of PLO.

The most interesting part (at least for me) would be finding hands that would actually pot/fold. I understand there are few of them (whether we take T52r flop, T95ss or AT9ss), but they exist (if I am not mistaken on T52r we fold 9% after potting).

Feel free to pn me if you want to go through some spots together.

Thanks, Phil!
Excellent explanation of your thought process, your brain is a stand-alone-solver!!

I've missed that "hey guys" part for Essential members. Could we get another one during 2021? :)

You need way more higher stakes, elite PLO content. It's severly lacking relative to NL

The QJ65 thing has my mind in a knot. Wouldn't the adjustment vs a perfect opponent to 1/2 pot to be polar and get weak one pair hands to fold more if they're calling pot with bdfd but folding to 1/2? Im missing something. My mind is blown. Any further thoughts? Great video as usual Phil! Thanks

Phil,

Ive been thinking about the AT9 two tone board and how its odd we pot AAA but b1/2 TT&99. Do you think its because we unblock Axxx so hard and dont want a dead tp to find a fold if we pot? In NL i've always loved sizing up with bottom and mid sets having TP unblocked because, hey, tp isnt folding ever in NL in 3b pots but this seems like the opposite theory here.

Do we still pot weak overpairs, no back up like JJ, TT on those disconnected rainbow flops?