Out Now
×

Preflop Lab: BTN Response vs BB 3-Bet

Posted by

You’re watching:

Preflop Lab: BTN Response vs BB 3-Bet

user avatar

Paul Toda

Essential Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

Preflop Lab: BTN Response vs BB 3-Bet

user avatar

Paul Toda

POSTED Apr 01, 2023

Paul Toda brings you a new installment of his preflop lab. In this video, you'll learn powerful heuristics to nail down your calling and 4-betting ranges from the button when facing a BB 3-bet.

5 Comments

Loading 5 Comments...

Haecceity 1 year, 11 months ago

Wonderful video Paul! I cannot remember when I saw an essential PLO video with so many valuable lessons that one can immediately take to the tables.

One question: I have heard that in the micros you should generally fold any hand with a single ace or single pocket pair to a 3-bet. Would you agree with this for the micros? What about double pairs?

Thanks very much.

Paul Toda 1 year, 11 months ago

I wouldn't fold any double pairs in this scenario BTN vs BB 3Bet and in general.
The single ace or single pocket pair category is a very large number of hands, so the answer would be mixed, some call, some fold, I don't think you can apply general rules like that to such a big category of hands.

Thank you for your positive feedback! I'm glad you enjoyed the video.

SoundSpeed 1 year, 11 months ago

Great video. Appreciate the breakdown on this concept. Would definitely like to see more like it.

21:00 it shows qq with 54, 53 and 43 is a call but 65 and 78 a fold. This seems a bit counter intuitive. Is it because of the way potential straights with 65 and 78 interacts with opponents 3bet range?

25:35 why do the non nutted suits prefer to 4bet? Doesn't that isolate them up against better flush draws more often?

Thanks!

Paul Toda 1 year, 11 months ago

As a general rule, the solver tends to prioritize calling with lower-connected cards rather than middling ones. This is because, as you mentioned, lower-connected cards with pairs are less likely to interact with the opponent's 3-bet range. Additionally, we often get paid off more when we hit on low boards compared to middling ones.

Non-nutted flush draws can face playability issues on middling to high SPRs, which makes them vulnerable to being dominated by stronger flush draws. To mitigate this risk, players with non-nutted flush draws may choose to 4-bet as a semi-bluff to gain fold equity and to reduce the SPR as much as possible. By reducing the SPR, non-nutted flush draws can become more playable and have more opportunities to realize their equity.
By 4-betting and reducing the SPR to 1 or under, the player can get it in with any piece of the board, any flush draw, without worrying about being dominated by stronger flush draws.

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy