I'm glad that you kept it to three tables instead of four. Personally, I would have preferred two tables, although others may find that to be too few. When the action gets too fast, it gets hard for me to follow. The most helpful part is your commentary throughout the video. The Aces breakdown and example play through vision was a big plus.
Hey, I'm happy you liked it!
I'm always puzzled if I should go deep in theory with spots, some people like it but some prefer more gameplay so I try to keep it short.
Thank you for your detailed feedback, it's very useful for me and it's highly appreciated.
9:15, JJ66r: You have a good point, I would say that it depends if the blinds are regulars or recreational, but I'm leaning for a fold now.
Thank you for the feedback!
Good analysis. I also think 2 tables of zoom is the sweet spot but you did a great job of stopping and rewinding the action to explain things so it was good.
I like the inclusion of vision and having some theory thrown in.
It seems like 33% block sizing is not a huge part of plo cbetting. Is that true and if so can it be eliminated for simplicity and just use 50% or pot?
2:10 table 3 t987 can we 3bet this with some frequency?
25:15 table 2 why do we want to chk here with a wrap and nut flush blocker? We push good eq and we have bluff opportunites with the As. Maybe chk without the As?
38:45 table 2 you mentioned 100bb we rng bet but deeper we have to be careful and if we bet here and get pot raised we have to fold. At 100bb deep if we bet and get pot raised are you still folding?
You can probably eliminate the 33%, but I wouldn't do it, it works great in a lot of spots.
2:10: Gto it's not in there, but depending on BTN's tendencies (opening too much, not 4betting, folding too much) it can be a profitable 3bet.
25:15: I would check the hand with or without the As, the hand fits perfect in our middle range, which wants to check, I would bet hands stronger like wrap+FD which can easily get it in, or weaker like AQQ3 which has good blocker to his continuing range but can easily fold vs a raise. Wraps with no backup are right in the middle, if you bet and get it in you are behind, and you can be even dominated by a hand like AQT3 +FD. The A flush blocker becomes more relevant with higher SPR, where is more room to play and turn it into a bluff. Also, wraps with no backup are very good checks for board coverage on the turn.
Yes mister, thank you, that is the way to go, for sure more real life play action needed! Especially in PLO last, quite long period, there are almost only "laboratory videos/lectures", so nice to see some playing at the tables. It would be also very interesting and educational to watch you playing and commenting on the fly too!
I will record a session and review it for the next videos. I can't make a live recording with me playing and commenting right now, my English is not good enough, maybe in a few months after I get more practice.
Thank you for your comment and your feedback!
37:15, QQ. Why it is bad to bet 41 instead of full pot 45? Does it shows that we don't bluff here?
Is it almost always wrong to do not pot river if you pot turn? Thanks
I don't think it makes much difference in theory in terms of EV, but it's hard to balance, and when you use an unusual sizing like that people tend to think more about the hand! I like to keep them in auto-pilot mode.
Loading 16 Comments...
Nice video. I always like your content
I'm glad that you kept it to three tables instead of four. Personally, I would have preferred two tables, although others may find that to be too few. When the action gets too fast, it gets hard for me to follow. The most helpful part is your commentary throughout the video. The Aces breakdown and example play through vision was a big plus.
Hey, I'm happy you liked it!
I'm always puzzled if I should go deep in theory with spots, some people like it but some prefer more gameplay so I try to keep it short.
Thank you for your detailed feedback, it's very useful for me and it's highly appreciated.
+1
Nice video.
Thank you!
I like the mix of action and theory analysis with vision. Great job.
Thank you!
9:15, JJ66r. Seems pretty loose to me preflop, especially with 2 shorties in the blinds,
who can easily be reopening the action.
I like when you switch to Vision, but could see you doing it even more :)
9:15, JJ66r: You have a good point, I would say that it depends if the blinds are regulars or recreational, but I'm leaning for a fold now.
Thank you for the feedback!
Good analysis. I also think 2 tables of zoom is the sweet spot but you did a great job of stopping and rewinding the action to explain things so it was good.
I like the inclusion of vision and having some theory thrown in.
It seems like 33% block sizing is not a huge part of plo cbetting. Is that true and if so can it be eliminated for simplicity and just use 50% or pot?
2:10 table 3 t987 can we 3bet this with some frequency?
25:15 table 2 why do we want to chk here with a wrap and nut flush blocker? We push good eq and we have bluff opportunites with the As. Maybe chk without the As?
38:45 table 2 you mentioned 100bb we rng bet but deeper we have to be careful and if we bet here and get pot raised we have to fold. At 100bb deep if we bet and get pot raised are you still folding?
Is there a part 2 coming? Thanks!
You can probably eliminate the 33%, but I wouldn't do it, it works great in a lot of spots.
2:10: Gto it's not in there, but depending on BTN's tendencies (opening too much, not 4betting, folding too much) it can be a profitable 3bet.
25:15: I would check the hand with or without the As, the hand fits perfect in our middle range, which wants to check, I would bet hands stronger like wrap+FD which can easily get it in, or weaker like AQQ3 which has good blocker to his continuing range but can easily fold vs a raise. Wraps with no backup are right in the middle, if you bet and get it in you are behind, and you can be even dominated by a hand like AQT3 +FD. The A flush blocker becomes more relevant with higher SPR, where is more room to play and turn it into a bluff. Also, wraps with no backup are very good checks for board coverage on the turn.
38:45: Yes, I would still fold.
Part 2 is finished, It will appear soon.
Your feedback is always appreciated.
Yes mister, thank you, that is the way to go, for sure more real life play action needed! Especially in PLO last, quite long period, there are almost only "laboratory videos/lectures", so nice to see some playing at the tables. It would be also very interesting and educational to watch you playing and commenting on the fly too!
I will record a session and review it for the next videos. I can't make a live recording with me playing and commenting right now, my English is not good enough, maybe in a few months after I get more practice.
Thank you for your comment and your feedback!
Cheers! Sure, I understand, post audio is fine as well, as long we see some real action:)
Thank you too!
37:15, QQ. Why it is bad to bet 41 instead of full pot 45? Does it shows that we don't bluff here?
Is it almost always wrong to do not pot river if you pot turn? Thanks
I don't think it makes much difference in theory in terms of EV, but it's hard to balance, and when you use an unusual sizing like that people tend to think more about the hand! I like to keep them in auto-pilot mode.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.