4:40 table 1 you said vs a short stack our hand is a standard 3bet. So at 100bb deep do you prefer to just call? Our hand still seems good enough to 3bet.
7:10 if we rasied utg and were 3bet by lp do we still want to raise a lot given the tighter ranges?
27:53 table 2 aq96ss seems wide. Is the cutoff the earliest position you will open this hand?
4:40 I would still 3bet in general vs a BTN open, but AQJ2$ds (Small detail: with the A and J suit) is near the bottom of our 3bet range and the player opening had a Vpip of 10 so I can see myself just flatting this hand vs a very tide BTN open 100bb, but 50bb probably mandatory 3bet.
7:10 Yes, It's still a way better strategy IMO than having no raises.
27:53 You can open it from MP also, under the right circumstances, like having a recreational in the blinds.
It's a solver-approved open from MP, I'm not too fond of it as an open, because you will get called too much by the IP players in general.
Hi Paul, I've got couple of questions regarding the AQJT hand at 38:30:
1) aren't we supposed to size on the turn only potsized, makes intuitively more sense.
2) solver seems to mix the river between folding and calling but i dont understand that it prefers to have 2 spades over 1 spade over 0 zero spade when deciding to call. What does make alot of sense me is that having the T is pretty bad, we much rather hold AQJ9 or AQJ8 when calling.
1) Yes, we are, but since the default sizing of online solvers like Vision is 75%, many people will still use that sizing.
2) Did you check the overall calling range with spades? Or just the AJ combos?
Loading 4 Comments...
Excellent series. I learned quite a bit.
4:40 table 1 you said vs a short stack our hand is a standard 3bet. So at 100bb deep do you prefer to just call? Our hand still seems good enough to 3bet.
7:10 if we rasied utg and were 3bet by lp do we still want to raise a lot given the tighter ranges?
27:53 table 2 aq96ss seems wide. Is the cutoff the earliest position you will open this hand?
Thanks!
4:40 I would still 3bet in general vs a BTN open, but AQJ2$ds (Small detail: with the A and J suit) is near the bottom of our 3bet range and the player opening had a Vpip of 10 so I can see myself just flatting this hand vs a very tide BTN open 100bb, but 50bb probably mandatory 3bet.
7:10 Yes, It's still a way better strategy IMO than having no raises.
27:53 You can open it from MP also, under the right circumstances, like having a recreational in the blinds.
It's a solver-approved open from MP, I'm not too fond of it as an open, because you will get called too much by the IP players in general.
Thank you for your feedback!
Hi Paul, I've got couple of questions regarding the AQJT hand at 38:30:
1) aren't we supposed to size on the turn only potsized, makes intuitively more sense.
2) solver seems to mix the river between folding and calling but i dont understand that it prefers to have 2 spades over 1 spade over 0 zero spade when deciding to call. What does make alot of sense me is that having the T is pretty bad, we much rather hold AQJ9 or AQJ8 when calling.
1) Yes, we are, but since the default sizing of online solvers like Vision is 75%, many people will still use that sizing.
2) Did you check the overall calling range with spades? Or just the AJ combos?
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.