Out Now
×

Paul Reviews His Student at $200 Rush PLO (Part 3)

Posted by

You’re watching:

Paul Reviews His Student at $200 Rush PLO (Part 3)

user avatar

Paul Toda

Essential Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

Paul Reviews His Student at $200 Rush PLO (Part 3)

user avatar

Paul Toda

POSTED Oct 07, 2023

Paul concludes this series with the final installment reviewing a student that has recently made it to the stakes of $200 PLO looking to fix any leaks in his game.

4 Comments

Loading 4 Comments...

SoundSpeed 1 year, 5 months ago

Excellent series. I learned quite a bit.

4:40 table 1 you said vs a short stack our hand is a standard 3bet. So at 100bb deep do you prefer to just call? Our hand still seems good enough to 3bet.

7:10 if we rasied utg and were 3bet by lp do we still want to raise a lot given the tighter ranges?

27:53 table 2 aq96ss seems wide. Is the cutoff the earliest position you will open this hand?

Thanks!

Paul Toda 1 year, 5 months ago

4:40 I would still 3bet in general vs a BTN open, but AQJ2$ds (Small detail: with the A and J suit) is near the bottom of our 3bet range and the player opening had a Vpip of 10 so I can see myself just flatting this hand vs a very tide BTN open 100bb, but 50bb probably mandatory 3bet.

7:10 Yes, It's still a way better strategy IMO than having no raises.

27:53 You can open it from MP also, under the right circumstances, like having a recreational in the blinds.
It's a solver-approved open from MP, I'm not too fond of it as an open, because you will get called too much by the IP players in general.

Thank you for your feedback!

GPFTW 1 year, 2 months ago

Hi Paul, I've got couple of questions regarding the AQJT hand at 38:30:
1) aren't we supposed to size on the turn only potsized, makes intuitively more sense.
2) solver seems to mix the river between folding and calling but i dont understand that it prefers to have 2 spades over 1 spade over 0 zero spade when deciding to call. What does make alot of sense me is that having the T is pretty bad, we much rather hold AQJ9 or AQJ8 when calling.

Paul Toda 1 year, 1 month ago

1) Yes, we are, but since the default sizing of online solvers like Vision is 75%, many people will still use that sizing.
2) Did you check the overall calling range with spades? Or just the AJ combos?

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy