Hey, Paul Atwal - Welcome back (please stick around)!
That comparison of strategies that you did around 40 minutes via the node-locking feature was quite eye-opening. Perhaps people were doing this sort of thing more often a couple of years ago and I missed it, but I honestly have no clue why there aren't dozens of videos out there that take an in-depth look at just how sensitive equilibrium strategies can be based on even slight changes in our opponent's strategy, and also how differently from an equilibrium strategy we can (should?) be playing based on a small amount of information that we have acquired about our opponent's tendencies. I am definitely a fan of the node-locking feature and really wish that more coaches would use it much more often than I see.
Anyway, thanks for the video, Paul. I really do hope to see some more from you in the future.
The node-lock tool is definitely useful. My only points of caution would be to try to find something quantitative to back up your assumptions, and be careful about using a max exploit where the counter exploit isn't that hard to find. For instance, making minor adjustments to the PFR's node facing xr after cb can produce results as dramatic as 100% xr as PFC. While this might be profitable in a vacuum, you leave yourself vulnerable in obvious ways. Consider making your exploits more subtle. In less obvious situations, you can probably get away with the max exploit.
Anyway, that might be obvious but I wanted to point it out. I was worried that viewers might find my node-locking too assumptive in this video, but it's nice to hear that you found value in the practice itself.
Thanks for the additional insight, as well as the advice, Paul. And while it is definitely easy to get a bit carried away with the node-locking, I feel like as long as we don't attempt to emulate the results and rather seek to simply understand them, it is quite helpful to see what takes place at the extremes because understanding that helps us understand more about the optimal strategy. Sort of like the difference between only knowing what the color gray looks like, versus understanding what the color gray is because you are familiar with both the black and the white extremes of the spectrum, as well as the concept that the color gray is something like a mixture of some parts black and some parts white.
nice video. the time/effort that you put in to this definitely paid off imo. for sure your best video (at least of the ones that i have seen.) hopefully you stick around as a coach on here!
Loading 4 Comments...
Hey, Paul Atwal - Welcome back (please stick around)!
That comparison of strategies that you did around 40 minutes via the node-locking feature was quite eye-opening. Perhaps people were doing this sort of thing more often a couple of years ago and I missed it, but I honestly have no clue why there aren't dozens of videos out there that take an in-depth look at just how sensitive equilibrium strategies can be based on even slight changes in our opponent's strategy, and also how differently from an equilibrium strategy we can (should?) be playing based on a small amount of information that we have acquired about our opponent's tendencies. I am definitely a fan of the node-locking feature and really wish that more coaches would use it much more often than I see.
Anyway, thanks for the video, Paul. I really do hope to see some more from you in the future.
Hey OMG, really glad you enjoyed it!
The node-lock tool is definitely useful. My only points of caution would be to try to find something quantitative to back up your assumptions, and be careful about using a max exploit where the counter exploit isn't that hard to find. For instance, making minor adjustments to the PFR's node facing xr after cb can produce results as dramatic as 100% xr as PFC. While this might be profitable in a vacuum, you leave yourself vulnerable in obvious ways. Consider making your exploits more subtle. In less obvious situations, you can probably get away with the max exploit.
Anyway, that might be obvious but I wanted to point it out. I was worried that viewers might find my node-locking too assumptive in this video, but it's nice to hear that you found value in the practice itself.
Thanks for the additional insight, as well as the advice, Paul. And while it is definitely easy to get a bit carried away with the node-locking, I feel like as long as we don't attempt to emulate the results and rather seek to simply understand them, it is quite helpful to see what takes place at the extremes because understanding that helps us understand more about the optimal strategy. Sort of like the difference between only knowing what the color gray looks like, versus understanding what the color gray is because you are familiar with both the black and the white extremes of the spectrum, as well as the concept that the color gray is something like a mixture of some parts black and some parts white.
nice video. the time/effort that you put in to this definitely paid off imo. for sure your best video (at least of the ones that i have seen.) hopefully you stick around as a coach on here!
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.