High Stakes Hands Examined
Posted by Patrick Sekinger
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 5 Comments...
43:40 mark could be the range make-up but I think you were right about wanting a spade on this hand for the AJo combo.
45:20 Your statement made me laugh kind of hard.
49:10 mention T6s on the 962ss-Tx-2x that "it's bluffing at a low frequency" I think this is actually a value bet as it has quite a bit of EV and you still have to call some AT, KT, QT combos...
Yeah, this is clearly a value bet, not sure why I didnt recognise this in the video, somehow thought this hand was 96s :D
Great video
28:40 surprised to see 45% checks in this spot with how strong our range is.. do you think you can just range bet 1/4 and not loose much ev?
I'm also curious that if you did range bet with A5ss here, would you jam the 5 turn, bet small or check?
36:30 why does having the 9d make the call vs river shove so much better?
28:40 I think rangebet 25% would probably be an ev loss but maybe not as bad if correct response to it was complex/unintuitive
36:30 Not 100% sure (I dont have the sim anymore) but I think it is likely to do with OOP cbetting flop with more 99dx combos than non bdfd ones and 99 is reasonable portion of our jam range
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.