$8 Turbo HH Review (part 1)

Posted by

You’re watching:

$8 Turbo HH Review (part 1)

user avatar

Owen Shiels

Essential Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

$8 Turbo HH Review (part 1)

user avatar

Owen Shiels

POSTED Jan 25, 2015

Owen takes a look at a recently play?ed turbo tournament. He experiences a number of interesting spots early on that he breaks down with ICMizer.

32 Comments

Loading 32 Comments...

biursf23 10 years, 1 month ago

nice vid owen:) keep it going, would like to see more turbo vids, as they are my favourite format (y) btw nice run, hope that I can steal little bit for myself :D

So_Nitty 10 years, 1 month ago

Me too! Great analysis of some tricky spots here....I liked the demonstration of ICMIZER and HM resources. Is the difference that HM Resources automatically plugs in the ranges for you and ICMIZER allows you to play with the ranges to adjust for player tendencies? So if you know a player is LAG you can widen the range? HM Resources automatically adjusts for stack sizes assuming normal player tendencies right?

Do you think that passing up some marginally +EV (.5 - 1 BB) is often advisable given ICM or does HM resources automatically adjust for that in the equation?

Owen Shiels 10 years, 1 month ago

HM Resources is NASH so its basically if everyone is playing perfectly, calling and shoving correctly then it shows what our range should be. ICMIZER allows you to adjust as you said.

As for passing up +CEV spots due to ICM considerations yes you have to a lot at fts. There are spots where because of short stacks your get in range pre is like KK+ whereas CEV wise you could be getting in AT+, 66+. ICM can make you have to play ultra tight.

effuno 9 years, 11 months ago

HRC shows nash ranges by default, but you can adjust the ranges the same way you do in ICMizer. They are very similar in basic functions. (I've used both: Icmizer for 1year, HRC for 4 months now)

Also, is +1bb considered marginal ? I've often been confused as to what is marginal. Ofcourse, it depends on stack size and opponents, but is +0.5bb profit not good enough an edge to take ( say, in a $8-$15/180m )?

maxtere 10 years, 1 month ago

Hi Owen, thanks for a nice video
First of all I would like to say that in Holdem Resources youcan edit ranges as well as in ICMIZER but it does not matter :D
I have a hand which I want to discuss with you.
16:40 55 I think that it could be a nice spot to 4bet shove if the opener has wide opening range which I think he has, given a stats. Of course it depends on how wide the btn is going to 3bet shove too. When I calculated this hand in holdem resources, 55 were around half blind +EV which I think is nice profit in turbo tournament.

musaire 10 years, 1 month ago

Yes:), I'd say the same about the HRC and a possibility to edit ranges and I'd cold4bet-shove 55 without much thinking in most cases as well.

Martin 10 years, 1 month ago

15:53 ATo I agree with the r/c, r/f line of thinking with this hand but would be jamming AJ. However, I'm curious to know if you are shoving any hands from that stack depth. IMO any suited broadways are great candidate for it as well as mid pp's say 55-88. I just hate to be r/f hands that show a nice +ev edge if shoved.

Owen Shiels 10 years, 1 month ago

Yeah I would be shoving stuff that I didn't really want to r/f. I would also be shoving stuff like ATo in this spot if the BB is a good reg who is going to flat my min open very wide and put me in difficult spots postflop. It just makes it a lot cleaner since ATo will be profitable to shove here anyway.

AOMax 10 years, 1 month ago

I habe to report one mistake. At 08:17 you are saying we would make 0.02 of a BB with The A4s openshove this is not actually true AS hrc displays The EV based on The total chips in play or ICM based money. So this push EV is 0.02% oft all chips in The table. Also this is based on perfect calling ranges. Generally i would not See anyone calling wider than perfect in an 8R tournament so you should See it also a bit More EV+ . it doesnt change our actions but i just wanted to be correct

musaire 10 years, 1 month ago

When using payout structure 'the first wins it all' (cEV) I think it can't give you the result in anything else than in BB only. When using a different payout structure, yes, it gives you the result as a percentage of the total money still in play at the table. Or at least I have always thought so.

effuno 9 years, 11 months ago

It depends on if you are using chipEV or ICM to caculate.
For cEV caculations, it does show profit in terms of BBs. Ofcourse, payout structure is irrelevant in that case -i.e 100% for first or 50/30/20 gives same result with cEV.
For ICM calculations it does shows % of prize you win with that hand, in which case, as you mentions in a later post, % of prize pool =% of chips if 1st gets 100% of prize.

for that particular hand he used cEV. So, it is 0.02BB profit

AOMax 10 years, 1 month ago

You didnt get me. It gives you the result as a percentage of total chips in play, because this is actually the same as the percentage of total money in play if winner takes it all.

musaire 10 years, 1 month ago

I opened the software to confirm and you are right! :) lol Thanks!
I have always used the FGS (intentionally for more real world accuracy) never knowing or thinking about it too much that it gives the %. It has been hard to notice because when playing turbo SNG's there is always roughly 100BB (just like a 100%) on the table starting from the middle of the game. :D
Wow, I did learn something new today. Hard to achieve lately. Though I never payd too much attention to by how much +EV the numbers are, any +EV was good to take notice of.

AOMax 10 years, 1 month ago

So as we are learning something new i can add information too to your post. Im a lowstakesgrinder, but I think in game theory im pretty good.

So I would not overvalue FGS, because as far as i understood it its basically calculates how wide your ranges are in the next spots and calculates the average Ev of all 100% of combinations in the next spots. This is in my opinion just really important if you are a shortstack and the blinds are coming soon.

In real world your estimated edge on the field should be way more important. For example if you play 10-15BB/100 you have to calculate that a slight eV+ calling spot might not be maxEV on the long term as you have the advantage of playing more hands where you can get eV. If your edge is not that big and you are shotting this is not accurate, but I just think this is good to have in mind. Especially in some cases if you have to broke against another big stack in a really fishy tournament. Also this makes more sense in reg speed tourneys, since you are more often in postflop situation and can make a lot of chips there. It always different, but its a limit of HRC.

Anyway i see not a point to dont push as wide as nash suggest (at least for first in pushes/ 3b pushes need the ranges adjustet). At under normal circumstances this should be more eV than nash says.

musaire 10 years, 1 month ago

I agree with it.
And, since HRC is for preflop calculations where we have short stacks with low win rate (I'm playing lots of turbo SNG's as well) the FGS method seems the best in lots of spots. Not sure how much difference it makes compared to other methods, haven't compared much, but maybe at final tables with a short stack it does.

youlosebro1 10 years, 1 month ago

I like all your videos and i stydy and learn from them because i have many leaks.Its my first time i comment and i am also happy y won 109 to pokerstars yesterday.I wish always run so good and help us to become better.Thanks again for your videos...

LifelikeFrankel 10 years, 1 month ago

Hi Owen!

Thanks again, I really enjoy your video's!
I have a question considering min-opening with a short stack. I noticed you talk a lot about min-opening hands with small stacksizes.

In this particular case, since it is 2x turbo and everyone is pretty short, not many people will play back and the main thing to consider is (indeed) re-shoving.

But I find that in (mainly) regular turbo's there are often 20+BB stacks (and off course sometimes also shorter stacks then that) that will play back at my min-opening, defending button or BB for example. I therefore often find it hard to min-open of-suit broadways or even hands like AJs/AQs/AKs or some pocket pairs because you can easily be out-flopped.

When it is non-turbo I have less problems with this, but since losing a pot being short can often kill me in a turbo, I'd rather open-shove some hands. I often become card dead afterwards and I don't want to bleed below (let's say) 7BB as a consequence of min-opening a hand that could have gotten a fold if I open-shoved it. Instead I rather prefer to open shove and pick up the blinds and antes then lose the (s)pot.

For instance, depending on my table off course, I often open-shove J10s with 15BB from early position. Or let's say AJo with 17BB from early position. I do have a balanced shoving range I think and they are always +EV. But not always optimal maybe when I see your approach.

What is your opinion on this? Should I just be more confident in my post-flop game? Do you adapt your min-opening/shoving balance to stack sizes and playback abilities of other players at your table?
I noticed I probably also do this to soon in regular tournaments. Should there be a (big) difference in my min-opening/shoving balnce in regular versus turbo games (or maybe 2x,3x turbo)?

Thanks in advance for your time.

Ciao

Frankel

Owen Shiels 10 years, 1 month ago

Hi Frankel
I really base this on what I think is going to be the most profitable way to play a hand. I think you are falling into a common trap of MTT players which is basing your actions on trying to take the easiest decision instead of the best one. Sure shoving AJ will probably be ok with 17BB from EP BUT you are allowing people to play pretty perfectly against you then. The area which the general poker population have improved the most on in the last few years is their shove/fold ranges so a lot of your opponents will know at least roughly what they need to call and what they need to fold against you in this spot.

The only reasons I ever start just taking the easy shove line with a 15+ BB stack from EP is either when we are near a bubble and I know people are going to be putting pressure on me so I want to take that option away from them or if I know the BB calls really wide to a min open and also plays very very well and will understand where they are postflop against my opening range.

You talked about not liking it when the blinds defend v your AK/AQ/AJ opens and this probably means you need to work a lot more on your postflop game and understanding where you are with flop textures. I'd imagine one of the most common things that happens to you is that you open AJ, get flatted by the BB, flop comes T hi or something and you get check raised when you C Bet. I'd imagine you really need to work on when to check back flops and try to get to showdown. Its really about creating a strategy which denies your opponent the opportunity to use their best weapons, and for the people who call a lot in the BB that is attacking people who c bet too much so checking takes that away from them.

Almost more importantly you are missing out absolutely tonnes of value from people reshoving on you light if you are choosing to just open shove your big aces and medium pairs with 15bb+ stacks. Players know that people are opening light from these stacks so you will often see them reshoving 22 or A5s against the min opens so if we are shoving say AJ or 88 with 15BBs from the cutoff then we are allowing them to fold these types of hands and missing out getting into a 30bb pot where we can have them crushed preflop.

My advice to you would be to go away and think about your postflop play a lot more. Go and watch some cash game videos maybe to learn more about postflop thinking and once you are more confident with it then you will be much more comfortable having min opening as part of your short stack game.

powpowlow 10 years, 1 month ago

Nice vid Owen. I like this format. The thing that worried me is how many good players has in final 3 or 4 tables. I saw just one fishy. Is this a tendency for this type tournaments? I mean in normal MTTs is ok to see only good players on the final but in turbos... What you say about this?

HerbertHe 9 years, 10 months ago

Hi Owen, thanks for your video. I am an amateur in China and sorry that I don't quite understand "I will be just shoving my whole range here". You said it during the 2nd hand (AKo, CO) in this video. Does it mean that you will shove any two cards (even 27o), or that you will shove a specific range (like AX & 22+)? Many thanks!

Owen Shiels 9 years, 10 months ago

Hi Herbert
Shoving my whole range means that if I choose to play a hand in this situation I will shove all in with it. I will not be shoving any two cards here but any 2 that I believe will be profitable to shove. The shoving my whole range part means that even if I have AA which is part of my range I will be shoving with it.

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy