$2k HUNL: Battling the Regs

Posted by

You’re watching:

$2k HUNL: Battling the Regs

user avatar

Nuno Alvarez

Elite Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

$2k HUNL: Battling the Regs

user avatar

Nuno Alvarez

POSTED Apr 10, 2021

Nuno Alvarez releases his first video covering the $10/$20 games and battles it out against some competent players and discusses his in-game thoughts as well as any leaks that he spots.

23 Comments

Loading 23 Comments...

proverbspoker 3 years, 11 months ago

Solid video, thanks for something from these stakes. One thing that threw me off was the 50% standard cbet on Tx, by chance that something you have discussed theory of in previous videos or is that just GTO knowledge? Other than that my thoughts were similar to yours so that was encouraging so perhaps Ill see you in the pool (;

Nuno Alvarez 3 years, 11 months ago

Thanks proverbspoker, glad you liked it and hope to see you in the pool sometime!

It's just GTO knowledge. Most players use 50% on these boards and it seems to be ht optimal betsize as far as I know.

CatorMan 3 years, 11 months ago

Great video. I always find these slower videos much more useful. The last hand was very interesting and I can definitely see I missplay that spot badly, going to have to play with PIO and see how closely it matches BTN vs BB.

Cheers!

Yolan 3 years, 11 months ago

13min hand

It seems weird to be that a hand like 6x is bluffing river because you have a tone of other combos to bluff with (QJ J9 etc...). Don’t you think those hands (even if they block a portion of vilain xf range) are not better to bluff shove rather than a hand who has a removal effect ?
I don’t think we ever shove 6x in theory

Edit : thanks for the sim ;)
I don’t think you can bluff all of these hands in 6max (full combo of QJ J9 and even some J5 Tx) cause the number of flushes you have btn vs bb is reduce quite a lot. Interesting to see that it’s not the case at heads up.

KT is only calling because you have KT yourself imo. Otherwise I don’t think it’s a really good bluffcatcher. I agree with you on this spot.

The 53 is very interesting, don’t you think in general people wouldn’t find enough raise on this board especially with the Ax low region ?
Something important here when we look your betting frequency on the turn is that we are in a spot where betting your 87 69 type hands don’t lead to lower your EQR so much (cause your out are mostly clean river against vilain s range when you hit.) By having a « similar » eqr, it doesn’t affect too much the ev or your bet. We can imagine that if it was the opposite, a lot of hands would have more incentives to X.
Are you ok with this statement ?

On the river , don’t forget to add bigger ovb cause it is often taken and there are cool to study.

Nice video, always like your content.

Cheers.

Nuno Alvarez 3 years, 11 months ago

Thanks Yolan! Happy to hear that you always like my content :)

13min hand

It seems weird to be that a hand like 6x is bluffing river because you have a tone of other combos to bluff with (QJ J9 etc...). Don’t you think those hands (even if they block a portion of vilain xf range) are not better to bluff shove rather than a hand who has a removal effect ?
I don’t think we ever shove 6x in theory

The only reason why 67o checks at some frequency here is because it has some EV when checking since we will showdown vs some AJ, AQ hands. If 67o didn't have any EV checking it will be a much better bluff than QJ, Q9, J9 type hands since those block a big portion of IP's folding range while 67o doesn't (and it also blocks 66)

I don’t think you can bluff all of these hands in 6max (full combo of QJ J9 and even some J5 Tx) cause the number of flushes you have btn vs bb is reduce quite a lot. Interesting to see that it’s not the case at heads up.

You must be right! In HU you have plenty of flushes in these spots so you need a decent amount of bluffs as well.

The 53 is very interesting, don’t you think in general people wouldn’t find enough raise on this board especially with the Ax low region ?

Yeah, I agree with that but even when that's the case, our hand is just too vulnerable that will prefer betting than checking as long as they defend the Flop reasonably wide.

Something important here when we look your betting frequency on the turn is that we are in a spot where betting your 87 69 type hands don’t lead to lower your EQR so much (cause your out are mostly clean river against vilain s range when you hit.) By having a « similar » eqr, it doesn’t affect too much the ev or your bet. We can imagine that if it was the opposite, a lot of hands would have more incentives to X.
Are you ok with this statement ?

This makes a lot of sense and I think that you're right! However, if our opponent is slightly overfolding OTT (which is very easy to do) those combos will gain a lot from betting and generating overfolds from the OOP range.

On the river , don’t forget to add bigger ovb cause it is often taken and there are cool to study.

Agree, thanks for the reminder!

RunItTw1ce 3 years, 10 months ago

Nuno Alvarez I am curious about coaches talking about rake structure and how you have to play preflop due to the rake structure. Low levels or micro levels are obviously really high rake, but the opponents are generally leaking money every where post flop. Wouldn't this offset the rake considerations? 6 min T#2 you defend 75o and say at this rake structure it's a defend. I would look at this spot as despite the rake structure, you are against a tough opponent acc3l3rati0n, so would look to just fold the weaker hands that become defends at higher stakes. Just look to fold these 0EV hands vs tough opponents. Similar to how regs avoid a lot of regs in six max but go after weaker regs or recreational players with tons of iso raises and 3 bets with a wider range. What are your thoughts on this subject?

Nuno Alvarez 3 years, 10 months ago

I completely agree with your thoughts here. A 0 EV Preflop hand can easily become a slightly +EV or slightly -EV hand depending on your opponent. That said, trying to avoid paying rake at lower stakes with marginal holdings is quite important since it is very high. In my opinion, the higher the stakes are, the more we should base our Preflop decisions on our Postflop edge.

RunItTw1ce 3 years, 10 months ago

9:30 mark mention you expect pool to under bluff this spot and mostly you are going to run into 2 pair+ here. Over the last month thanks to psek and some other coaches one thing I was able to put into my game a little bit are hands like AJ are actually going to be checking back this turn in six max pretty often. Then vs a river bet 2/3 or smaller sizing TPTK+ will look to raise for some thin value. Actually just checked it, some KJ and even QJ are raising this river in six max. I am a little surprised why KJ and QJ are raising the river more than AJ... it is a really cool spot to have in your tool box with B - XX- Raise river with one pair. Get called by some really funky hands because it looks so bluffy on brick rivers. Not sure what my question is here... I guess any idea why TPGK is raising more than TPTK? Of course HU ranges much wider than six max, but I assume same concept applies.

Nuno Alvarez 3 years, 10 months ago

I think the idea should be that AJ blocks part of their bluffcatching range while KJ and QJ don't. Whenever you are unsure about why the solver is choosing some hands over others, check the other player range and you'll find the answer to those questions most of the time!

RunItTw1ce 3 years, 10 months ago

15 min - If your opponents shoes if you have 2 pair or set would you consider just blocking the river and folding to a raise? I think when opponent checks you will be able to find quite a few bluffs, but not sure if you still find those bluffs vs a block sizing, which I assume opponent can mix in a decent amount of flushes into that range as well. At least against weaker opponents I think you gain some value with block betting but also clairvoyance as they will tend to only call and not bluff raise. I even see people get scared with smaller flushes like 7d4d here and don't want to raise, so they just call. Thoughts on blocking the river in Villain's shoes?

Nuno Alvarez 3 years, 10 months ago

Good question! I think that playing blockbets on his shoes is definitely sound with a big part of his range. I personally will condense my betting range on a 2/3 betsize and protect my thinner valuebets with my flushes. Exploitatively, blockbetting is really strong as you mentioned since the population will fail to find enough raises against it both for value and as bluffs.

RunItTw1ce 3 years, 10 months ago

36:15 when villain faces an overbet on the river it's folding some of the Ax but finding some calls with K5s K3s type hands, but also only calling with 55 (full house). I thought your combo would be turned into a bluff here to try and make villain fold trip aces. The 53 is blocking a large portion of his calling region. Looks like a good exploit spot if you remove villain from having your combo, he's going to struggle to find calls here.

Nuno Alvarez 3 years, 10 months ago

A9o, A8o hands are our bluffing hands here. The idea is that straights are the bottom for the overbet sizing of the IP player and we have stronger removal effect with our Ax hands than with our 53s combos and those are better calling hands at the same time since they unblock every single bluff on the IP range. Quite a tricky spot since the overbet range for IP is very condensed so we need to be very meticulous with our blocker choices.

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy