6:19 right table. When he narrows his range to flushs+ (I assumed that!) coming from a T76 texture I assume that at 100bb's a lot of fd's+bdoor equity are going to play more aggressively especially when IP bets 1/2. So his value range is way more strict than it would vs a larger flop cbet or a more dry flop texture.
Then I ran a sim and found that some of the non-flushes/straights can bet 2x pot vs 1/2-check line. Interesting! Maybe it is not just as common for humans. Flushes are mixing quite a lot, ranging from 75% to 500% pot, maybe very sensitive to IP strategy setup.
Definitely not common for humans to use this sizing with worse than straights/flushes on this line. If the Turn completes the flush and the action goes check/check I wouldn't be as surprised to see some players valuebetting 2 pair hands for this sizing on blank Rivers. Anyway, thanks for taking the time on running this and sharing your input :)
Loading 4 Comments...
Interesting hands and explanations.
Thank you!
6:19 right table. When he narrows his range to flushs+ (I assumed that!) coming from a T76 texture I assume that at 100bb's a lot of fd's+bdoor equity are going to play more aggressively especially when IP bets 1/2. So his value range is way more strict than it would vs a larger flop cbet or a more dry flop texture.
Then I ran a sim and found that some of the non-flushes/straights can bet 2x pot vs 1/2-check line. Interesting! Maybe it is not just as common for humans. Flushes are mixing quite a lot, ranging from 75% to 500% pot, maybe very sensitive to IP strategy setup.
Hey thanks for your comment!
Definitely not common for humans to use this sizing with worse than straights/flushes on this line. If the Turn completes the flush and the action goes check/check I wouldn't be as surprised to see some players valuebetting 2 pair hands for this sizing on blank Rivers. Anyway, thanks for taking the time on running this and sharing your input :)
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.