Nice run, Loved the Psyduck banter on the FT haha.
Any plans on doing a series on the Super Tuesday big score you made in Feb? i'm sure that would be a popular one!
Thanks! I have been debating between doing that tournament and attempting some sort of live video during SCOOP. I need to review it again and see if it will be worthwhile.
@13:35. I don't understand the thinking of betting bigger ott to set up river shove. I think using 2/3 sizing ott seems fine if you're including some pair+fl draw type stuff in your betting range and the fact that if u actually have the nuts he's often drawing dead.
so river is an overbet shove. is that really terrible? seems like it allows us to bluff more often in theory. and i also think 2/3 turn, overbet shove river is likely a better sizing plan to get river folds if that's our goal in a vacuum.
going bigger on the turn seems like it will get more turn folds and encourage ip to play more of a raise/fold game ott. I don't think that's what we want to accomplish with our range.
Hey schifty, I think you are correct here. If anything I may have wanted to plan the hand a little better on the flop if I really wanted to set up pot shove otr. This kind of texture Im not sure I really want to be overbet shoving river that often, as Ill have a lot more hands in the larger but not overbetizing value range. Reviewing the hand now seems like I'd use the same sizes again. You make a good point about wanting to play our overall range this way as we get to value bet much more things than just nut flushes
Loading 4 Comments...
Nice run, Loved the Psyduck banter on the FT haha.
Any plans on doing a series on the Super Tuesday big score you made in Feb? i'm sure that would be a popular one!
Thanks! I have been debating between doing that tournament and attempting some sort of live video during SCOOP. I need to review it again and see if it will be worthwhile.
@13:35. I don't understand the thinking of betting bigger ott to set up river shove. I think using 2/3 sizing ott seems fine if you're including some pair+fl draw type stuff in your betting range and the fact that if u actually have the nuts he's often drawing dead.
so river is an overbet shove. is that really terrible? seems like it allows us to bluff more often in theory. and i also think 2/3 turn, overbet shove river is likely a better sizing plan to get river folds if that's our goal in a vacuum.
going bigger on the turn seems like it will get more turn folds and encourage ip to play more of a raise/fold game ott. I don't think that's what we want to accomplish with our range.
Hey schifty, I think you are correct here. If anything I may have wanted to plan the hand a little better on the flop if I really wanted to set up pot shove otr. This kind of texture Im not sure I really want to be overbet shoving river that often, as Ill have a lot more hands in the larger but not overbetizing value range. Reviewing the hand now seems like I'd use the same sizes again. You make a good point about wanting to play our overall range this way as we get to value bet much more things than just nut flushes
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.