Hey Ed Walters it's a feature that's available in different software to help you focus on upcoming decisions when multitabling to avoid getting drawn into observing a runout that doesn't really make a difference while you need to play on other tables.
@17:29 with the trip Kings, if he bets we fold because it's underbluffed.
I'm not saying it isn't underbluffed, but what does he hav that plays that way that beats us?
22 ? QQ? KQ? AK? AA? a backdoor flush?
those hands all seem super unlikely given his line of just calling our bets.
I am not saying you are wrong, but I would have a real hard time not only saying ahead of time I would fold, but actually folding here at 50nl.
which is probably why you are teaching classes and I am playing 50nl, lol
When we have a data driven approach, we let go of this hand reading thought process in some situations. I'm sure you have played a hand in which "he couldn't have hands x, y and z because of the way he played" but he ended up having those hands lol
In practice people are way more unpredictable than what we give them credit for, and it's a mistake to mirror our strategy onto other players. So if I know that the data says that it's a super underbluffed spot, I'll just fold. The thing is: maybe he's only betting that river 10% of the time, but when he does he has much more value than he should.
And honestly I think it's super likely that he can have a bunch of full houses there
Loading 6 Comments...
I may have asked before - but why does it cover the table runout when you are all in?
like on the 43s vs JJ hand @3:43
Hey Ed Walters it's a feature that's available in different software to help you focus on upcoming decisions when multitabling to avoid getting drawn into observing a runout that doesn't really make a difference while you need to play on other tables.
@17:29 with the trip Kings, if he bets we fold because it's underbluffed.
I'm not saying it isn't underbluffed, but what does he hav that plays that way that beats us?
22 ? QQ? KQ? AK? AA? a backdoor flush?
those hands all seem super unlikely given his line of just calling our bets.
I am not saying you are wrong, but I would have a real hard time not only saying ahead of time I would fold, but actually folding here at 50nl.
which is probably why you are teaching classes and I am playing 50nl, lol
Hey Ed, thanks for the comment!
When we have a data driven approach, we let go of this hand reading thought process in some situations. I'm sure you have played a hand in which "he couldn't have hands x, y and z because of the way he played" but he ended up having those hands lol
In practice people are way more unpredictable than what we give them credit for, and it's a mistake to mirror our strategy onto other players. So if I know that the data says that it's a super underbluffed spot, I'll just fold. The thing is: maybe he's only betting that river 10% of the time, but when he does he has much more value than he should.
And honestly I think it's super likely that he can have a bunch of full houses there
@35:31 you say villian had "a straight on the turn", but I think he rivered it.
QT on 4JA98
True
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.