Hello Max, enjoy hearing your ideas as usual. At 1.30 you decided to pure 3bet the 97s vs a tighter player. Is the reasoning here that this player won't 4bet enough and won't defend postflop enough, so your EV will be increased? Would you pure 3bet this hand vs a really really tight player, e.g. playing 14 VPIP or less?
14vpip I think might be too low to do that, we'll end up just get 4bet too often imo. But 18-20, specially being a passive player postflop is worth it.
I believe that a 100z reg wouldn't be playing as polarized as he should on this flop, therefore I expect him to c-bet more other with most pairs and bluffs on the flop, making his checking range very merged, so I decided to put a lot of pressure on that range. GTOwise I don't think it's a good idea tho, cause GTO will have a lot of 5x on the check back range.
Loading 6 Comments...
Hello Max, enjoy hearing your ideas as usual. At 1.30 you decided to pure 3bet the 97s vs a tighter player. Is the reasoning here that this player won't 4bet enough and won't defend postflop enough, so your EV will be increased? Would you pure 3bet this hand vs a really really tight player, e.g. playing 14 VPIP or less?
Exactly!
14vpip I think might be too low to do that, we'll end up just get 4bet too often imo. But 18-20, specially being a passive player postflop is worth it.
At 16.30 was interesting to see you pot the turn on table 1 with J4 on 953t5. Can you talk me through the ideas here with this strategy?
I believe that a 100z reg wouldn't be playing as polarized as he should on this flop, therefore I expect him to c-bet more other with most pairs and bluffs on the flop, making his checking range very merged, so I decided to put a lot of pressure on that range. GTOwise I don't think it's a good idea tho, cause GTO will have a lot of 5x on the check back range.
Great video thanks.
Thanks for the comment!
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.