Out Now
×

$200 Zoom: Playing w/ Very High Aggression

Posted by

You’re watching:

$200 Zoom: Playing w/ Very High Aggression

user avatar

EluSiVeMark

Elite Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

$200 Zoom: Playing w/ Very High Aggression

user avatar

EluSiVeMark

POSTED Dec 26, 2020

Mark Lammers aka ElusiveMark continues his session at the $200 zoom tables and opting for the most aggressive option whenever reaching a point in the decision tree offering multiple options.

6 Comments

Loading 6 Comments...

zache86 4 years, 3 months ago

Very interesting last hand with those KQs on the 4B pot vs AA...i think it's a fine check back on the river.
Don't think population will call worse enough and if they are turning something into a bluff (what?) our EV goes to the floor.

Nice video!

RunItTw1ce 4 years, 3 months ago

Q1) 2 min QT on T-6-3-6-T board you XC flop, then lead turn, and over bet river. I was thinking river should be a block bet. If you are leading to represent 6x on the turn, seems inconsistent to now rep Tx / bluff on the river. I understand you can take this line with some 54, 87, 97, etc type hands and try and get AX to fold, just seems strange to over bet 6x on the river if that is the story you were telling on the turn. When you call the river raise, is it to avoid running into quads / paying more rake? Don't think worse ever calls?

Q2) 5:40 KJs on btn vs CO. I noticed Sauce in his recent video was flatting SB as well as HJ with KJs and mentioned having a flatting strategy has more value than a 3 bet / fold strategy. You mentioned KJs is high frequency 3bet. Personally I was flatting the outside region of the suited broadways ATs, KTs, QTs, J10s, then 3 betting AJs+, KJs+, & QJs+. I would mix the AJo & KQo with 3 bets / flats depending on RFI sizing / position. Also mixing the SCs and AXs more based on player opening rather than a robotic strategy. Wanted your thoughts on this as I often see AK 3 bet, AQo flat, and AJo being 3 bet / fold. Being a polar 3 bet strategy top and bottom and flatting middle of range. I prefer to 3 bet a more linear approach but mix in the polar region 76s-54s, A5s-A3s. Any feed back on this would be helpful.

Q3) 30:50 any reason to raise the turn? on 3k95ss board there are a ton of combo draws that would check raise flop, then barrel turn imo, can really make their life miserable and raise for thin value, maybe just shove. Imagine a lot of tough river spots. Also when players have tendency to fire twice and check river unless hit.

Q4) 37:50 would like to hear the thought process on this turn raise. 3bet pot preflop, cbet 1/3, you mention if you get raised you would fold, then you face a donk bet and you raise. Do you think there is just a lot of JTs, QTs, A10s type hands in range that floated and block bet the turn? Are you planning on shoving blank rivers or checking back? I would be mostly worried about 77 / 88. Also not sure if combo draws like J10 ever jams the turn.

EluSiVeMark 4 years, 3 months ago

q1) You are right. Blockbetting can also induce a bluffraise. River 3bet doesn't cost extra rake i guess, but 6x isn't raising river and calling a 3bet.
q2) My general advice with regards to 3betting is: Whenever his calling range vs 3bets is one you dominate then go ahead and 3b. When he folds many hands that dominate your hand then also 3bet. When u fold out worse hands by 3betting and let him continue with hands that dominate yours then usually cold call or fold. So it is player dependant. Also if he 4bets aggressively and u cannot call a 4bet +EV then it's probably better to flat.
q3) Jamming the turn makes his life easy. He just folds his bluffs/ draws unless they have too much equity and always calls better. Raise/ folding can be an option if u know he doesn't jam his draws.
q4) Don't think this is a card that improves him that often. Leading turn cards might be a T a 5 and perhaps a 9 or spade. If he calls i would jam blank rivers to fold out 76,87,77 type hands.

LiveCashGuy 4 years, 3 months ago

Can you explain the concept/reasoning why some pros 3bet for around 4x from the SB and 5x from the big blind? I'm assuming monker proves this to be more +EV?

EluSiVeMark 4 years, 3 months ago

SB has a liniair 3bet range and the BB has a slightly more polar range.
I guess u see a slight difference with regards to sizing in Monker.

ModernGrinder 3 years, 9 months ago

EluSiVeMark What kind of an AF were you running with here? What is your average AF across the board? Do you consider AF a more accurate, relevant stat than AFq, if one was only able to add either or to their HUD?

Thanks

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy