I am curious about the 97 hand around 8:00 on table 3, you said that you would check back aq there more often than not. I understand why you would do that(you have a certain amount of sd value and you consider that AQ is too strong to bluff with !?) but dont you think that it's more value in a 3barell bluff, i mean you block his strongest hands and his stroger straight draw+ you do not block any of his weacker hands wich would call 2 streets and fold river. I think a 3barell bluff with AQ is the superior play on blanks both in single raised pots and, maybe more, in 3bet pots.

Hey Darkridee,

I think a mixed strategy is best here. We want to have AQ in our betting range aswell in our checking back range. I am not sure what the right frequency is though. But if we consider the fact that we can call any turn profitable after checking back then i think we can start betting all our AQ's with a backdoor flushdraw and planning to barrel of on quite a bit of runouts and check back the ones without the bd flushdraw.

VS a guy that defends quite wide vs btn opens i think we can include some more AQ combos to start bluffing just because on this board we have a whole lot of nutted hands and he doesn't.

This guy is marked as purple so he doesnt defend very wide vs button opens which makes his range stronger and thus we should be bluffing less.

were u being sarcastic that " he played it well" around 25min when he c/r J8dd on 733 after u cold 4? if u were not, can you explain why pls?

I really enjoyed "he played it well versus my perceived weak range" at ~26min