Hand Review Study Session: Postflop Spots
Posted by Pedro Madeira
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 6 Comments...
First hand was a rainbow flop but you input a two toned flop. Could you multiply stack size and pot size by 10 in these low spr spots? on the A78 board the 30% size was rounded up to 40%. I'd be interested in seeing if 25-30% was chosen. Turn and river decisions will also be different because BB continuing range will be tighter vs that 40% size.
Last hand is really interesting. It isn't immediately obvious to me which blockers are good or bad. Do you have any opinions on how players play hands like 99 98,97 and 65,95 on the flop compared to equilibrium? Do you think his value range has 78 or only boats? I think population doesn't block bet 9x on the river as much as the solver does, so I think they'll have more opportunities to bluff with it. Especially 96. A8 also feels better than A7 to me because 7x is more likely to bluffraise flop. Even though the solver never bluff jams those bare 7x on the river, they have more opportunities to make a mistake. I could also see overfolding because I expect more 99 and 55 than the solver gets to the river with, and river raises being underbluffed in general.
Hey mate!
I am sorry it took so long for me to get back to you, I was taking a short time off after WCOOP.
Anyway, ansewring your questions:
"First hand was a rainbow flop but you input a two toned flop."
The fact the board was two tone on flop or on the turn will not change much the results.
"Could you multiply stack size and pot size by 10 in these low spr spots?"
What do you mean by that? That strategies will remain the same? If so, that`s not true
"on the A78 board the 30% size was rounded up to 40%. I'd be interested in seeing if 25-30% was chosen. Turn and river decisions will also be different because BB continuing range will be tighter vs that 40% size."
It won`t change much as the most used sizing is the bigger one.
And regards to the last hand.
I believe vs a small cbet sizing the high stakes field playes very similiar to the solver on the flop, but I guess it starts to deviate from turn onwards. But even though the ranges population deviate from each other, the frequencies should be very similar, meaning i should be bet/calling this A8.
"Could you multiply stack size and pot size by 10 in these low spr spots?"
He means that if you use a potsize of 6 instead of 60 some rounding mistakes occur with betsizes that are quite close to each other, e.g 40% and 27% nets the same bet (=2).
ah, got that.
Thank you GeeTeeOh
Hey , I don't know how I missed your vid , maybe something was wrong with RIO filters , but that was interesting video.
Thx for the content.
no worries.
Im glad you liked it!
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.