Trend Spotting: Stack to Pot Ratio
Posted by Krzysztof Slaski
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 6 Comments...
Hi Krzysztof ! Great one as always ;) . Thanks you !
I have 3 questions :
Board dynamic 986 . We can see a huge diff between SPR 5.5 and other strat for IP. Is it only because OOP can deny a ton of equity by x shoving that we don’t use more that 33% betsize IP at all ?
Why a hand use a less EV move at some portion of the time instead of a + ev bet sizing ? If you have a bluff, you basically want to be 0ev to let vilain indifferent between call/fold with his bluffcatcher , so you bet these hands at some frecs in order to maintain the ev of your value hand higher ? I m not sure that works this way.
This situation is an example , 36:20 77 hand.
Hope my question was clear.
Do you now when your next video will publish ? It would be nice when videos are linked will not publish at 2 months gap.
Hey Yolan
Big reason why we see a big shift between the 2.5spr and 5.5 is that OOP no longer leads a lot of its strong stuff in the 5.5spr game. Therefore the IP player faces two completely different ranges when he sees a check. From there on I believe the shift in sizing is just dictated by the SPR.
The reason why some hands go into a bet size despite having slightly lower EV is the effect this has on the rest of the ranges. PIO is a very thorough player, so if you have the slightest leak in your range - it will find and exploit it. When a range has some hands that really prefer the smaller bet (in this case I believe it is the 99, 88 and T6s hand), but there aren't a lot of diversified combos in the range in general, PIO needs to use a bunch of different hands in that range so that the blocker effects don't open an exploit opportunity for the opponent. In this case, even though 77 takes(a very marginal) hit in EV, the rest of that range benefits enough for the move to be profitable. If the difference in EV between the bets was big, it would not happen as it would be that much more difficult to make it up.
Unfortunately I have no control over this, I only do the uploading. I believe my videos are scheduled to come out every other week.
Cheers
Fearless Leo is back
As much as I enjoy seeing Krzysztof Slaski when the video starts up, I must admit that I am thrilled to see Leo back! I am sure there are many others out there in the "silent majority" who are relieved and excited about this as well. I know for sure that Jeff_ is excited =]
Hi Krzysztof Slaski I'm a little late to the discussion but i have just started following this series of videos a few days back. I feel like this is a very good way of trying to understand different ways in which PIO is making it's decisions.
Regarding this video, we see that in both cases, dry and wet flops, the difference in strategies for players remain essentially the same when SPR is 16 or 30. Could this actually also open up the idea that at stack depths deeper than 15 SPR, our strategies could remain the same?
It is a massive generalization, but if true, it could be so helpful as we wouldn't have to ever study deeper SPR's than 15 then. Given, I might have to run some more flops but do you think this could be a potential inference from this video as well?
Hey,
I haven't done enough work to answer this question confidently. For the most part in 6max though there isn't going to be a great difference between 15spr and 20spr for flop strategies.
As far as studying deeper than 15spr goes, you will get a good idea of the difference between low/100bb spr play and deepstack play to extrapolate how larger stacks will work, so I think saving yourself solving time and just studying 15spr is a good approach.
Cheers.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.