Hey Jae, really like your videos in general. Love your comment about how people do pseudo mixing or non mixing telling themselves they made good plays without realizing how their overall frequencies are very OOL.
At 19:57, you said this is a spot where it's hard to run solvers as I agree. I would approach this spot as betting larger or not is specifically a matter of how much Jx opponent has. As we are pretty polar on flop as IP I think a fair amount of Jx should be checking river for OOP and therefore it seems like going larger than what you did can start to go negative as folding out k high and decent amounts of a high seems to be accomplished enough with 66% and any larger starts to go negative with prediction errors by just running into 8x and jx.
Of course at midstakes I understand recs, as this player seems to be by limp call pre many players never check jx or 8x and if that's the player type then I tend to go large exploitatively to make sure the ax is being folded out at a higher threshold
Great post hapa. The last paragraph is what I was trying to get across. I do think there is a certain bet threshold he will respect with his bluffcatchers, especially since the bet size looks quite large visually and is a big chunk of his chips. But this varies from player to player,
Loading 2 Comments...
Hey Jae, really like your videos in general. Love your comment about how people do pseudo mixing or non mixing telling themselves they made good plays without realizing how their overall frequencies are very OOL.
At 19:57, you said this is a spot where it's hard to run solvers as I agree. I would approach this spot as betting larger or not is specifically a matter of how much Jx opponent has. As we are pretty polar on flop as IP I think a fair amount of Jx should be checking river for OOP and therefore it seems like going larger than what you did can start to go negative as folding out k high and decent amounts of a high seems to be accomplished enough with 66% and any larger starts to go negative with prediction errors by just running into 8x and jx.
Of course at midstakes I understand recs, as this player seems to be by limp call pre many players never check jx or 8x and if that's the player type then I tend to go large exploitatively to make sure the ax is being folded out at a higher threshold
Great post hapa. The last paragraph is what I was trying to get across. I do think there is a certain bet threshold he will respect with his bluffcatchers, especially since the bet size looks quite large visually and is a big chunk of his chips. But this varies from player to player,
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.