hey man great vid !

q10 hand super interesting, its difficult to be super accurate with ranges here,10x with J or Q seem fine flop c.r bluffs we probably want j10o way more though i think? aq 3bet calling pre more than AJ etc

really tough to build c.r here since flop wont be range check and alot of our value just bets flop

this hand definetly seems reasonable turn lead for big sizing and as played
would'nt mind just jamming river as we put ton of pressure on ax, and see very few slow plays IP turn. I think KQ very rarely gets bet IP on flop from population which makes bluffing somewhere even more attractive.

Very interesting hand!

Hi Patrick Brooks ,

Thanks. For IP I think it's difficult for a portion of the range as some players 3b call AQ or AJo+, 88+ while some mix with some of those, have more pp, SC in their call range, etc. Our flop strategy is gonna change depending on IP range but not by a lot as most of the IP range is quite similar. Hence QT is gonna play somewhat similar wrt x or bet, but as far as XR goes think it's
mostly gonna come down to how many bet/folds IP has. Same with JT. There should be small differences between QT or JT if IP flats AQ or AJ and similar hands, but overall don't think it's a huge difference as if IP doesn't bet small pp and similar bluffs we don't XR either I don't think.

I agree with turn lead. In-game I was actually thinking about small size lead, but big sizing
makes a lot of sense, and I think it would work quite well. I also agree that river shove would be good sometimes and simply comes down to how sticky we think IP is gonna be with Ax.

In hindsight, I think turn lead for a big size at high or even pure freq would be best as it puts Ax in the most difficult spot.