$30/$60 2-7 Triple Draw
Posted by Iteopepe88
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 8 Comments...
Appreciate you also explaining the type of reads and notes you would take.
13:30 are these calls with a pair of 2s somewhat standard in full ring btn vs bb?
What about oogee raising on the river instead of calling?
15:50 you talked about how some players in 2-2 spots will raise a bet when they improve to a 1 card draw but they will be unbalanced. Is it ok to just call rng in spots where you improve but you drew the same number of cards as your opponent?
29:18 first draw was 3 3 and you improved to a 2 card draw but checked. Shouldn't it normally be a bet?
Looking forward to part 2. Any stud hi or 8 game coming up?
Thanks!
13:30
Usually in 1:1 spots when we hit the lowest pair it's a better calling/bluffcatching hand than a Q/K/A, because with that we will also block villain's valuebet range. Positions doesnt matter too much here imo, when it's 1:1 at river.
With 22 he has a bluffcatcher so i don't really like to turn that hand into bluff. Had he pair the jack he can/should consider raise. Although if he raises all JJs he will overbluff here, so he has to be more careful.
15:50
I guess your question is that sometimes you will raise your strongest draw, depending on RNG, right? So in 2:2, when you improve from 237 to 2347/2375/2376 you will raise like 50%?
It's a little bit better strategy imo, but you will be still unbalanced.
Against very bad players it's not that big of a problem to be unbalanced, but very good players know how to adjust.
29:18 No, it's never a bet. Kind of similar to the previous street. If you bet here with 237-2, but you check with 236x (no blocker), or 278 you will be just unbalanced. Against very bad players maybe it's not big of a problem, but good players know how to adjust/exploit it.
15:50 I was just thinking that if we call a raise predraw and the draw goes 2 2 and we improve to a 1 card draw but our opponent bets I would just call all of my 1 card draws and never raise. Since my opponent is repping a 1 card draw (which may or may not be better than ours) or is pat it is better to call. Is it bad to do that? Should we have a raise range with non pat hands?
29:18 I thought predraw it went limp/check so I thought we would always bet if we improved.
15:50, I misunderstood you then. I agree with you here completely. In D2 spots, when i get lead to i don't have a raising range with 1c draws
29:18
Yes it went limp/check, and 3-3.
We can bet if we improve to 1c draw :) But with 2c draws, being oop we are not pushing that big of an equity edge even with premium draws (such as 234/237), and we will be also quite faceup, unbalanced in this spot.
It would be different if it's 3-4 spot (or 3-5), then we kind of want to bet all 2c draws oop
Hi Iteopepe88 thanks for video. The request is video on A-5, badugi, badeucey, badacey :)
And some more specific video requests: stud8 HU play or S8 BTN vs bring in scenarios
Iteopepe88 Very last hand after cap pre and 1-1 you said you would XR if you hit a club. Could you explain in details why would you need here a XR range at all? I expect getting a bet here after my X only from improved hands and ocasipnally from very best 1draw hands. I dont want to miss value by getting Xback. If it goes XX and we pat we never have bluffs here huh
I think players are betting too much in this position. 1:1 after the first draw, at the small bet street. Don't know why is that, because i think it's not that good. Some players are betting UI 86 draws, some players are also going to bet with the intention to early pat something, and against those two type of players i would like to have a checkraise range.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.