41:40 No, i wouldn't raise there. But it depends on the exact board, what do we mean by non steal spot? What are the exact dead cards, which position he opened, etc.
But in general I think against a tight range, when somebody bets with KThhAx vs our 6Q5rb we can even consider to have just a call only. Even weak 2pairs are (like 65-6Q5) are not doing that fine against somebody who opens a tight range and shows KThhAx board (but once again, depends on the dead cards a lot!)
1:07:00 I don't know what he does in a 3bet pot only :) Guess your question is more about what should he/we do :)) It's a tough spot, but I probably would call still (*for chipEV)
Mixed games are so interesting, great video @Iteopepe88. Excited to watch more of your mixed game content. I'm the classic boring NLH player and loved watching the WSOP variety this year. Looking forward to more like this.
44:11 From what I saw of the range you imputed in the PIO for BB, we have a more linear strategy. Are these ranges adapted to the scenario with ICM considerations or are they Monker ranges?
The ranges I have here suggest a more polar strategy in BW dynamics and for the HU format a linear range.
I also have an RFI of 67% for a raise only SB strategy, your solution appears 62%.
I find it too big of a work (for less EV) to run and have exact monker and/or ICM ranges for LHE preflop. So in general I just use a "basic" range that I think the average players play. Therefore it's not 100% correct, but I can get the conclusion still and I find it useful to send the (study) time for different spots (where i can get more EV).
In general I have 66% raise only for SB as the standard too in my saved PIO range. But I found that players plays a little bit tighter than that these days, that's why in this solution I gave Dan Zack "only" 62%
Loading 6 Comments...
Outstanding!
41:40 if weisman had been in a non steal spot would you ever make that 5th street raise?
1:07:00 if the pot was just 3bet pre draw does zack fold?
Thanks!
Sorry for the late reply
41:40 No, i wouldn't raise there. But it depends on the exact board, what do we mean by non steal spot? What are the exact dead cards, which position he opened, etc.
But in general I think against a tight range, when somebody bets with KThhAx vs our 6Q5rb we can even consider to have just a call only. Even weak 2pairs are (like 65-6Q5) are not doing that fine against somebody who opens a tight range and shows KThhAx board (but once again, depends on the dead cards a lot!)
1:07:00 I don't know what he does in a 3bet pot only :) Guess your question is more about what should he/we do :)) It's a tough spot, but I probably would call still (*for chipEV)
Mixed games are so interesting, great video @Iteopepe88. Excited to watch more of your mixed game content. I'm the classic boring NLH player and loved watching the WSOP variety this year. Looking forward to more like this.
44:11 From what I saw of the range you imputed in the PIO for BB, we have a more linear strategy. Are these ranges adapted to the scenario with ICM considerations or are they Monker ranges?
The ranges I have here suggest a more polar strategy in BW dynamics and for the HU format a linear range.
I also have an RFI of 67% for a raise only SB strategy, your solution appears 62%.
Thank you, great content.
I find it too big of a work (for less EV) to run and have exact monker and/or ICM ranges for LHE preflop. So in general I just use a "basic" range that I think the average players play. Therefore it's not 100% correct, but I can get the conclusion still and I find it useful to send the (study) time for different spots (where i can get more EV).
In general I have 66% raise only for SB as the standard too in my saved PIO range. But I found that players plays a little bit tighter than that these days, that's why in this solution I gave Dan Zack "only" 62%
1:07:00 haha yeah, what would you do :)
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.