grea vid. at 2min, you say ur gunna cbet and barrel AK on 633 after squeezing, does it makes sense to turn it into a bluff and barrel it down? i understand cbetting small with range but is it best to turn it into bluff? isn't he going to peel a small bet with AQo and KQs AJs hands with BD flush draws? wouldn't we have better hands to pinpoint his pocket pairs to try to bluff/put pressure on them?
at 11min with QQ, u cbet 54 into 109 on 765ss, are you betting range there for value/protection? and on river you fold bc you say he shudnt turn 99/TT into bluffs now if didn't on turn, but on turn, its not the bottom of his range, (ace high was), now 99/TT is bottom of range given QJss KQss type hands bluff turn and Ax is top pair now... not sure what your range looks like entirely, and maybe QQ still isn't a call cuz u got Ax hands, but i do think 99/TT shud be bluffing
2:00 First of all it is vs a weaker player. His openingsrange is quite high and his fold vs 3bet very low. The top of his range is going to be small to medium pocket pairs and A highs. He is very likely to fold them vs a triple barrel. A nice benefit is when he calls A high type of hands or a hand like KTs-KQs and we both hit a pair we get his stack. So combining the Fold equity, our equity and the times we both hit a pair and win his stack i prefer just cbetting with the plan of barreling on most turns and rivers.
I think you are right with the QQ hand. Otf i think its close between cbetting or a x/c. If his fold vs 3bet was a bit lower this board connects a bit better with his range. (he has more sets and sc's in his range). So then i would definitely x/c a lot of my range in stead of betting.
I think the river decision is close aswell and a call should be considered. Some players woulndt turn 99 TT etc into bluffs but this particular opponent i think is capable with a wwsf% of 52.
thank you, so you barrel AK despite the fact that when u bet turn unimproved, u mostly fold out his KQs-KTs and AQo AJs type stuff and have him call now with only hands that beat you (pocket pairs), so wouldn't it be more efficient to barrel hands like T9s and J9s type stuff, that dont block his folding range and block the top of his pocket pair range and benefit from folding out KQ AK AQ KJ and have somewhat clean outs. AK has a decent EV to check turn to get to showdown after protection/valuebetting range on the flop. i dont know given its poor blockers and SD value to use this as a bluff given he has to fold so much its a higher EV to barrel down then check down (so must be a good amount over 0EV bluff). If you think he folds his whole range, thats another story, but idk if u have that read or confidence to determine that for certain. obviously then u gotta barrel it.
with QQ, i agree given his higher fold to 3b, but does this mean u cbet range here versus this opponent? cuz ur bet is smaller, implying a more linear range rather then a polarized one. am i wrong about this?
Im not going to 3bet these types of hands u mentioned vs a weaker player oop. So my range is going to be quiite strong and AK,AQ AJS types of hands are the bottom of my range. And i did think i would fold close to 100% of his range by 3barreling.
With the QQ hand i am going to be betting my overpairs (qq+) a decent % of the time. I am going to bet my 2prs more often than not and probably mix my straights . And the gutters that i could have i would usually bet.
But like i said, when i think his range hits this board harder i would mix in a lot more checks.
thanks!, sorry last followup. so if u check some hands on this board cuz u think he hits it decently hard, then ur betting more polar and therefore shudnt the sizing be larger then 54 into 109?
No problem at all, happy to answer all the questions!
Yes when i am betting a more polarized range i usually bet larger. In some cases i dont mind using smaller sizings with a polarized range when the board is going to change a lot and we are oop.
30 min K9; u decided to chB K9 on the turn, but besides JT, QT, he could also have AT, and this is way more likely because he can even flat offsuit combos, and KTs, T9s are also possible.
For some balance checking can be good, but he will not have hands which are bluffing on the river after u check the turn.
Good vid, as i see u don't hesitate to make some good folds!!!
38:52 you called Q6s BB vs UTG minraise, your opponent seems to be opening like 20%, do you think it's profitable, and what your overall cc range vs minraise BBvsUTG looks like?
44:44 AQ, you ch/c flop and ch/f turn, on AJKx, this hand is probably top of your ch/calling range, so it's weak to fold this on the turn, however if villain never bluffs it could be ok.
38:52.
VS a 20% range minraising i think we can defend any 2 suited if our opponent doesnt have a significant edge on us. 32s has 30% equity vs top18% and we need about 23% equity. I think anything over 30% is a +ev call.
I think i made an incorrect fold with the AQ. His sizing suggest a similair strength hand a lot. And when we are behind we have ok equity. So i think this turn should be a call even though this villain is unlikely to be bluffing here.
Loading 17 Comments...
grea vid. at 2min, you say ur gunna cbet and barrel AK on 633 after squeezing, does it makes sense to turn it into a bluff and barrel it down? i understand cbetting small with range but is it best to turn it into bluff? isn't he going to peel a small bet with AQo and KQs AJs hands with BD flush draws? wouldn't we have better hands to pinpoint his pocket pairs to try to bluff/put pressure on them?
at 11min with QQ, u cbet 54 into 109 on 765ss, are you betting range there for value/protection? and on river you fold bc you say he shudnt turn 99/TT into bluffs now if didn't on turn, but on turn, its not the bottom of his range, (ace high was), now 99/TT is bottom of range given QJss KQss type hands bluff turn and Ax is top pair now... not sure what your range looks like entirely, and maybe QQ still isn't a call cuz u got Ax hands, but i do think 99/TT shud be bluffing
forgot the reply btn
Ty Fivebetbluff,
2:00 First of all it is vs a weaker player. His openingsrange is quite high and his fold vs 3bet very low. The top of his range is going to be small to medium pocket pairs and A highs. He is very likely to fold them vs a triple barrel. A nice benefit is when he calls A high type of hands or a hand like KTs-KQs and we both hit a pair we get his stack. So combining the Fold equity, our equity and the times we both hit a pair and win his stack i prefer just cbetting with the plan of barreling on most turns and rivers.
I think you are right with the QQ hand. Otf i think its close between cbetting or a x/c. If his fold vs 3bet was a bit lower this board connects a bit better with his range. (he has more sets and sc's in his range). So then i would definitely x/c a lot of my range in stead of betting.
I think the river decision is close aswell and a call should be considered. Some players woulndt turn 99 TT etc into bluffs but this particular opponent i think is capable with a wwsf% of 52.
thank you, so you barrel AK despite the fact that when u bet turn unimproved, u mostly fold out his KQs-KTs and AQo AJs type stuff and have him call now with only hands that beat you (pocket pairs), so wouldn't it be more efficient to barrel hands like T9s and J9s type stuff, that dont block his folding range and block the top of his pocket pair range and benefit from folding out KQ AK AQ KJ and have somewhat clean outs. AK has a decent EV to check turn to get to showdown after protection/valuebetting range on the flop. i dont know given its poor blockers and SD value to use this as a bluff given he has to fold so much its a higher EV to barrel down then check down (so must be a good amount over 0EV bluff). If you think he folds his whole range, thats another story, but idk if u have that read or confidence to determine that for certain. obviously then u gotta barrel it.
with QQ, i agree given his higher fold to 3b, but does this mean u cbet range here versus this opponent? cuz ur bet is smaller, implying a more linear range rather then a polarized one. am i wrong about this?
Im not going to 3bet these types of hands u mentioned vs a weaker player oop. So my range is going to be quiite strong and AK,AQ AJS types of hands are the bottom of my range. And i did think i would fold close to 100% of his range by 3barreling.
With the QQ hand i am going to be betting my overpairs (qq+) a decent % of the time. I am going to bet my 2prs more often than not and probably mix my straights . And the gutters that i could have i would usually bet.
But like i said, when i think his range hits this board harder i would mix in a lot more checks.
thanks!, sorry last followup. so if u check some hands on this board cuz u think he hits it decently hard, then ur betting more polar and therefore shudnt the sizing be larger then 54 into 109?
No problem at all, happy to answer all the questions!
Yes when i am betting a more polarized range i usually bet larger. In some cases i dont mind using smaller sizings with a polarized range when the board is going to change a lot and we are oop.
Hey, 2:57 you fold k8o in bb to cut off 2.5x, is this std for you?
yes
Vs the better regs it would be my standard. It's going to be tough to realise equity with these kinds of hands. It might be slightly +ev to defend.
Rake has a significant impact though. So at the higher stakes this is going to be a better call.
30 min K9; u decided to chB K9 on the turn, but besides JT, QT, he could also have AT, and this is way more likely because he can even flat offsuit combos, and KTs, T9s are also possible.
For some balance checking can be good, but he will not have hands which are bluffing on the river after u check the turn.
I thought that he would have less AT than JT,QT because most villains are 3betting AT close to 100% of the time.
And because of this turn 1 street might be the maximum to get here.
Good vid, as i see u don't hesitate to make some good folds!!!
38:52 you called Q6s BB vs UTG minraise, your opponent seems to be opening like 20%, do you think it's profitable, and what your overall cc range vs minraise BBvsUTG looks like?
44:44 AQ, you ch/c flop and ch/f turn, on AJKx, this hand is probably top of your ch/calling range, so it's weak to fold this on the turn, however if villain never bluffs it could be ok.
38:52.
VS a 20% range minraising i think we can defend any 2 suited if our opponent doesnt have a significant edge on us. 32s has 30% equity vs top18% and we need about 23% equity. I think anything over 30% is a +ev call.
I think i made an incorrect fold with the AQ. His sizing suggest a similair strength hand a lot. And when we are behind we have ok equity. So i think this turn should be a call even though this villain is unlikely to be bluffing here.
22mins the 33 vs 103s hand when you call river. What is the worst flush you are calling with here if any?
?
Since i probably only valuebet the Kd here i would call the Kx with a blocker to the full house. So the KdTx Kd3x KdAx
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.